From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4283C4332B for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 09:14:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C3B2206F6 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 09:14:47 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="DHlZLzA0" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727160AbgCXJOq (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2020 05:14:46 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:40670 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726129AbgCXJOq (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2020 05:14:46 -0400 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300EC2F0BC80045DE39F951CA54F5.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f0b:c800:45de:39f9:51ca:54f5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 8C4621EC0874; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 10:14:44 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1585041284; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=uzzGGHDkBHLvDBgnszVbyyyHxRp3zjTrIEQ+Rqkl4nE=; b=DHlZLzA0Ozf1SEQuf9H9gsOO/quv/ucrY162NxVhYPSYDSnVrWWIJTMSYRC+wA3Vw6nWu0 0wyshMOEvq/SSe0pYY4Al2UVnHIzzeO/pIAAOIBf/R4Bum29OBYeEfeSdjrK6bD3brIt+5 NInWino+MtYHOKIxxKlJkcyUg37cstw= Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 10:14:37 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Masahiro Yamada Cc: Kees Cook , "Jason A. Donenfeld" , Arvind Sankar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , X86 ML , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Thomas Lendacky , Mauro Rossi , Michael Matz Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/changes: Raise minimum supported binutils version to 2.23 Message-ID: <20200324091437.GB22931@zn.tnic> References: <20200113161310.GA191743@rani.riverdale.lan> <20200113195337.604646-1-nivedita@alum.mit.edu> <202001131750.C1B8468@keescook> <20200114165135.GK31032@zn.tnic> <20200115002131.GA3258770@rani.riverdale.lan> <20200115122458.GB20975@zn.tnic> <20200316160259.GN26126@zn.tnic> <20200323204454.GA2611336@zx2c4.com> <202003231350.7D35351@keescook> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 06:02:02PM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote: > Borislav, > > When I forwarded this patch, I fixed up one more line. > (changes.rst duplicates the same information...) > > Please see this. I hope this should be OK. > https://lore.kernel.org/patchwork/patch/1214519/ Thanks. However, I wanted to queue this patch *after* 5.7-rc1 and so that it lands in 5.8 and so that it has a maximum cycle in testing - well, it is not really testing but getting more people to see it and have the chance to complain - and not queue it now. I did some searching on distrowatch.com last night and the couple of distros shipping binutils 2.23 I saw, were already EOL but the search was not exhaustive. And from looking at your patchset, I think it should get the max time testing in linux-next too, so that we have time to address any build issues it might uncover. IMO. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette