From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51FD9C4332B for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 11:06:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 212C520786 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 11:06:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="oVX4yLyb" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727279AbgCXLGl (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2020 07:06:41 -0400 Received: from mail-pj1-f67.google.com ([209.85.216.67]:55417 "EHLO mail-pj1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726524AbgCXLGk (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Mar 2020 07:06:40 -0400 Received: by mail-pj1-f67.google.com with SMTP id mj6so1324705pjb.5 for ; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 04:06:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=W2zZIBrFIUdIwJtiA0rHIIgEIRNeZEGmX6yVzyUZvcU=; b=oVX4yLyb5aLdnDPwC6UADVmWbjxBpmsWAqZNIVQkDWjtUja3ZmwH6bPKE/lhYj1E+z KZHq73DSe3wsRdhB9iQwRmYAzFvLXQW0h9v8Q86SqDWGvMKkJ7p0aN05ttV0BPbHXXmb EW56hwB8e8dgWPV2NLU8m0mvyOFwbsTqiyDe/Jie768Nr64T9YbDj5EgYlgPShbhyyhe aRaWjSdG+i0mA6veN8WOGvvUr2K8jaxFuLzkz9V51b3ue0nq3qNeCL91Ram/rNqzFdaq 9YSADk86aYG33/NL+L6aNw4kyS2HnEhF5skYdNoV87DNAuB+R9diYHZcOzYZ8R7XxaRe qNHQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=W2zZIBrFIUdIwJtiA0rHIIgEIRNeZEGmX6yVzyUZvcU=; b=ircoqlsa4cxM3IA4LTfKxM3du1rKgHXTpgSkpuBzHPX0s1qR1+qIkE7G6vMRoKnL9b ovLRtdl1DiR3k3K6piNnX0d+Vo8o4MKZp88F45xg3TmYs/m2j53yVYlO2lQYet+7lTCW icaXOooTa2pGf0ZXRVenL7xi3N14rYzGFUGqGlSmlMFKmqYc1AFSApEnNK0BXOLcEhG3 wMx4dWBSz+ehixhOS7LIqVuUoqUatU6XQDypQQ1v6tPkSQ2UgFV5V1AnGD6C2wi72FDY zyRs4dw+S0il8BvF2Gth+fTI9kgcXiwlHTcPN3wjFPO8cIOvursPHXke4s2uWLCj97Dn UOFw== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ2tD6t5NzHdcBrebPiPrqr5dOQOz1jV2TvjFpU5dfXPgVIeD4Fd aFgMFB0dFv9qY/6LqTJ5rTo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vukAws34i1riRLz0FLNUO0kB8kxFAaHg2peUeXCCNis1uXRRG22cmYupdWicicN+fxtnlNVvA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:e003:: with SMTP id u3mr2981827pjy.157.1585047999939; Tue, 24 Mar 2020 04:06:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([49.207.53.57]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g7sm1997709pjl.17.2020.03.24.04.06.38 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Tue, 24 Mar 2020 04:06:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2020 16:36:37 +0530 From: afzal mohammed To: Michael Ellerman , Thomas Gleixner Cc: Christophe Leroy , Scott Wood , Kumar Gala , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Michael Ellerman , Vitaly Bordug , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] powerpc: Replace setup_irq() by request_irq() Message-ID: <20200324110637.GA5836@afzalpc> References: <20200304004746.4557-1-afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com> <20200312064256.18735-1-afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200312064256.18735-1-afzal.mohd.ma@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.3 (2018-01-21) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Michael Ellerman, On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 12:12:55PM +0530, afzal mohammed wrote: > request_irq() is preferred over setup_irq(). Invocations of setup_irq() > occur after memory allocators are ready. > > Per tglx[1], setup_irq() existed in olden days when allocators were not > ready by the time early interrupts were initialized. > > Hence replace setup_irq() by request_irq(). > > [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/alpine.DEB.2.20.1710191609480.1971@nanos > > Signed-off-by: afzal mohammed This patch is seen in next-test branch for last 4-5 days, i don't know exactly how powerpc workflow happens, so a question - this would be appear in linux-next soon right ? (for last 4-5 days i had been daily checking -next, but not appearing there). Sorry for the query for this trivial patch, i am asking because Thomas had mentioned [1] to get setup_irq() cleanup thr' respective maintainers (earlier it was part of tree-wide series), check -next after -rc6 & resubmit ignored ones to him, this patch is neither in -next, neither ignored, so i am at a loss what to do :( And i would prefer to let each patch go thr' respective maintainers so that only least patches has to be sent to Thomas. Bigger problem is that core removal patch of setup_irq() can be sent to him only after making sure that it's tree-wide usage has been removed. Regards afzal [1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/87y2somido.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de