Re: [PATCH bpf-next v5 6/7] tools/libbpf: Add support for BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM

Andrii Nakryiko
2020-03-23T20:25:55Z

On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 9:45 AM KP Singh <kpsingh@chromium.org> wrote:
>
> From: KP Singh <kpsingh@google.com>
>
> Since BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM uses the same attaching mechanism as
> BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING, the common logic is refactored into a static
> function bpf_program__attach_btf.
>
> A new API call bpf_program__attach_lsm is still added to avoid userspace
> conflicts if this ever changes in the future.
>
> Signed-off-by: KP Singh <kpsingh@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Florent Revest <revest@google.com>
> ---
> tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c | 3 ++-
> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h | 4 ++++
> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map | 3 +++
> 4 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
> index c6dafe563176..73220176728d 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/bpf.c
> @@ -235,7 +235,8 @@ int bpf_load_program_xattr(const struct bpf_load_program_attr *load_attr,
> memset(&attr, 0, sizeof(attr));
> attr.prog_type = load_attr->prog_type;
> attr.expected_attach_type = load_attr->expected_attach_type;
> - if (attr.prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS) {
> + if (attr.prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS ||
> + attr.prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM) {
> attr.attach_btf_id = load_attr->attach_btf_id;
> } else if (attr.prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING ||
> attr.prog_type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT) {
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> index 085e41f9b68e..da8bee78e1ce 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
> @@ -2362,7 +2362,8 @@ static int bpf_object__finalize_btf(struct bpf_object *obj)
>
> static inline bool libbpf_prog_needs_vmlinux_btf(struct bpf_program *prog)
> {
> - if (prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS)
> + if (prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS ||
> + prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM)
> return true;
>
> /* BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING programs which do not attach to other programs
> @@ -4870,7 +4871,8 @@ load_program(struct bpf_program *prog, struct bpf_insn *insns, int insns_cnt,
> load_attr.insns = insns;
> load_attr.insns_cnt = insns_cnt;
> load_attr.license = license;
> - if (prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS) {
> + if (prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_STRUCT_OPS ||
> + prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM) {
> load_attr.attach_btf_id = prog->attach_btf_id;
> } else if (prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING ||
> prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT) {
> @@ -4955,6 +4957,7 @@ int bpf_program__load(struct bpf_program *prog, char *license, __u32 kern_ver)
> int err = 0, fd, i, btf_id;
>
> if ((prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING ||
> + prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM ||
> prog->type == BPF_PROG_TYPE_EXT) && !prog->attach_btf_id) {
> btf_id = libbpf_find_attach_btf_id(prog);
> if (btf_id <= 0)
> @@ -6194,6 +6197,7 @@ bool bpf_program__is_##NAME(const struct bpf_program *prog) \
> } \
>
> BPF_PROG_TYPE_FNS(socket_filter, BPF_PROG_TYPE_SOCKET_FILTER);
> +BPF_PROG_TYPE_FNS(lsm, BPF_PROG_TYPE_LSM);
> BPF_PROG_TYPE_FNS(kprobe, BPF_PROG_TYPE_KPROBE);
> BPF_PROG_TYPE_FNS(sched_cls, BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_CLS);
> BPF_PROG_TYPE_FNS(sched_act, BPF_PROG_TYPE_SCHED_ACT);
> @@ -6260,6 +6264,8 @@ static struct bpf_link *attach_raw_tp(const struct bpf_sec_def *sec,
> struct bpf_program *prog);
> static struct bpf_link *attach_trace(const struct bpf_sec_def *sec,
> struct bpf_program *prog);
> +static struct bpf_link *attach_lsm(const struct bpf_sec_def *sec,
> + struct bpf_program *prog);
>
> struct bpf_sec_def {
> const char *sec;
> @@ -6310,6 +6316,10 @@ static const struct bpf_sec_def section_defs[] = {
> SEC_DEF("freplace/", EXT,
> .is_attach_btf = true,
> .attach_fn = attach_trace),
> + SEC_DEF("lsm/", LSM,
> + .is_attach_btf = true,
> + .expected_attach_type = BPF_LSM_MAC,
> + .attach_fn = attach_lsm),
> BPF_PROG_SEC("xdp", BPF_PROG_TYPE_XDP),
> BPF_PROG_SEC("perf_event", BPF_PROG_TYPE_PERF_EVENT),
> BPF_PROG_SEC("lwt_in", BPF_PROG_TYPE_LWT_IN),
> @@ -6572,6 +6582,7 @@ static int bpf_object__collect_struct_ops_map_reloc(struct bpf_object *obj,
> }
>
> #define BTF_TRACE_PREFIX "btf_trace_"
> +#define BTF_LSM_PREFIX "bpf_lsm_"
> #define BTF_MAX_NAME_SIZE 128
>
> static int find_btf_by_prefix_kind(const struct btf *btf, const char *prefix,
> @@ -6599,6 +6610,9 @@ static inline int __find_vmlinux_btf_id(struct btf *btf, const char *name,
> if (attach_type == BPF_TRACE_RAW_TP)
> err = find_btf_by_prefix_kind(btf, BTF_TRACE_PREFIX, name,
> BTF_KIND_TYPEDEF);
> + else if (attach_type == BPF_LSM_MAC)
> + err = find_btf_by_prefix_kind(btf, BTF_LSM_PREFIX, name,
> + BTF_KIND_FUNC);
> else
> err = btf__find_by_name_kind(btf, name, BTF_KIND_FUNC);
>
> @@ -7452,7 +7466,8 @@ static struct bpf_link *attach_raw_tp(const struct bpf_sec_def *sec,
> return bpf_program__attach_raw_tracepoint(prog, tp_name);
> }
>
> -struct bpf_link *bpf_program__attach_trace(struct bpf_program *prog)
> +/* Common logic for all BPF program types that attach to a btf_id */
> +static struct bpf_link *bpf_program__attach_btf(struct bpf_program *prog)

bpf_program__attach_btf_id() would be a bit more precise name

> {
> char errmsg[STRERR_BUFSIZE];
> struct bpf_link *link;
> @@ -7474,7 +7489,7 @@ struct bpf_link *bpf_program__attach_trace(struct bpf_program *prog)
> if (pfd < 0) {
> pfd = -errno;
> free(link);
> - pr_warn("program '%s': failed to attach to trace: %s\n",
> + pr_warn("program '%s': failed to attach: %s\n",
> bpf_program__title(prog, false),
> libbpf_strerror_r(pfd, errmsg, sizeof(errmsg)));
> return ERR_PTR(pfd);
> @@ -7483,10 +7498,26 @@ struct bpf_link *bpf_program__attach_trace(struct bpf_program *prog)
> return (struct bpf_link *)link;
> }
>
> +struct bpf_link *bpf_program__attach_trace(struct bpf_program *prog)
> +{
> + return bpf_program__attach_btf(prog);
> +}
> +
> +struct bpf_link *bpf_program__attach_lsm(struct bpf_program *prog)
> +{
> + return bpf_program__attach_btf(prog);
> +}
> +
> static struct bpf_link *attach_trace(const struct bpf_sec_def *sec,
> struct bpf_program *prog)
> {
> - return bpf_program__attach_trace(prog);
> + return bpf_program__attach_btf(prog);

well, no, it should call bpf_program__attach_trace()

> +}
> +
> +static struct bpf_link *attach_lsm(const struct bpf_sec_def *sec,
> + struct bpf_program *prog)
> +{
> + return bpf_program__attach_btf(prog);

and bpf_program__attach_lsm() here, don't shortcut invocation (you
argued yourself above, what if something about LSM changes, why
updating this invocation as well?)

> }
>
> struct bpf_link *bpf_program__attach(struct bpf_program *prog)
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
> index d38d7a629417..df1be44c8118 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.h
> @@ -248,6 +248,8 @@ bpf_program__attach_raw_tracepoint(struct bpf_program *prog,
>
> LIBBPF_API struct bpf_link *
> bpf_program__attach_trace(struct bpf_program *prog);
> +LIBBPF_API struct bpf_link *
> +bpf_program__attach_lsm(struct bpf_program *prog);
> struct bpf_map;
> LIBBPF_API struct bpf_link *bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(struct bpf_map *map);
> struct bpf_insn;
> @@ -321,6 +323,7 @@ LIBBPF_API int bpf_program__set_socket_filter(struct bpf_program *prog);
> LIBBPF_API int bpf_program__set_tracepoint(struct bpf_program *prog);
> LIBBPF_API int bpf_program__set_raw_tracepoint(struct bpf_program *prog);
> LIBBPF_API int bpf_program__set_kprobe(struct bpf_program *prog);
> +LIBBPF_API int bpf_program__set_lsm(struct bpf_program *prog);
> LIBBPF_API int bpf_program__set_sched_cls(struct bpf_program *prog);
> LIBBPF_API int bpf_program__set_sched_act(struct bpf_program *prog);
> LIBBPF_API int bpf_program__set_xdp(struct bpf_program *prog);
> @@ -347,6 +350,7 @@ LIBBPF_API bool bpf_program__is_socket_filter(const struct bpf_program *prog);
> LIBBPF_API bool bpf_program__is_tracepoint(const struct bpf_program *prog);
> LIBBPF_API bool bpf_program__is_raw_tracepoint(const struct bpf_program *prog);
> LIBBPF_API bool bpf_program__is_kprobe(const struct bpf_program *prog);
> +LIBBPF_API bool bpf_program__is_lsm(const struct bpf_program *prog);
> LIBBPF_API bool bpf_program__is_sched_cls(const struct bpf_program *prog);
> LIBBPF_API bool bpf_program__is_sched_act(const struct bpf_program *prog);
> LIBBPF_API bool bpf_program__is_xdp(const struct bpf_program *prog);
> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
> index 5129283c0284..ec29d3aa2700 100644
> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.map
> @@ -243,5 +243,8 @@ LIBBPF_0.0.8 {
> bpf_link__pin;
> bpf_link__pin_path;
> bpf_link__unpin;
> + bpf_program__attach_lsm;
> + bpf_program__is_lsm;
> bpf_program__set_attach_target;
> + bpf_program__set_lsm;
> } LIBBPF_0.0.7;
> --
> 2.20.1
>