From: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>
To: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
Ashish Kalra <Ashish.Kalra@amd.com>,
Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@amd.com>,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] KVM: SVM: Move and split up svm.c
Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2020 13:31:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200325123112.GB18178@8bytes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200324183007.GA7798@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, Mar 24, 2020 at 11:30:07AM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> What are people's thoughts on using "arch/x86/kvm/{amd,intel}" instead of
> "arch/x86/kvm/{svm,vmx}"? Maybe this won't be an issue for AMD/SVM, but on
> the Intel/VMX side, there is stuff in the pipeline that makes using "vmx"
> for the sub-directory quite awkward. I wasn't planning on proposing the
> rename (from vmx->intel) until I could justify _why_, but perhaps it makes
> sense to bundle all the pain of a reorganizing code into a single kernel
> version?
I am fine either way, naming the directory amd/ or svm/ doesn't make a
big difference.
Regards,
Joerg
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-25 12:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-24 9:41 [PATCH 0/4] KVM: SVM: Move and split up svm.c Joerg Roedel
2020-03-24 9:41 ` [PATCH 1/4] kVM SVM: Move SVM related files to own sub-directory Joerg Roedel
2020-03-24 9:41 ` [PATCH 2/4] KVM: SVM: Move Nested SVM Implementation to nested.c Joerg Roedel
2020-03-24 19:02 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-03-25 12:32 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-03-24 9:41 ` [PATCH 3/4] KVM: SVM: Move AVIC code to separate file Joerg Roedel
2020-03-24 9:41 ` [PATCH 4/4] KVM: SVM: Move SEV " Joerg Roedel
2020-03-24 11:33 ` [PATCH 0/4] KVM: SVM: Move and split up svm.c Paolo Bonzini
2020-03-24 17:56 ` Ashish Kalra
2020-03-24 18:30 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-24 18:42 ` Jim Mattson
2020-03-24 18:55 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-03-25 13:49 ` Paolo Bonzini
2020-03-25 12:31 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200325123112.GB18178@8bytes.org \
--to=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=Ashish.Kalra@amd.com \
--cc=brijesh.singh@amd.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox