Re: [PATCH V10 08/11] iommu/vt-d: Add svm/sva invalidate function

Jacob Pan
2020-04-01T15:57:53Z

On Wed, 1 Apr 2020 06:57:42 +0000
"Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com> wrote:

> > From: Tian, Kevin <kevin.tian@intel.com>
> > Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2020 2:24 PM
> > To: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
> > Subject: RE: [PATCH V10 08/11] iommu/vt-d: Add svm/sva invalidate
> > function
> > > From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
> > > Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2020 2:14 AM
> > >
> > > On Sat, 28 Mar 2020 10:01:42 +0000
> > > "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > > From: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
> > > > > Sent: Saturday, March 21, 2020 7:28 AM
> > > > >
> > > > > When Shared Virtual Address (SVA) is enabled for a guest OS
> > > > > via vIOMMU, we need to provide invalidation support at IOMMU
> > > > > API and driver level. This patch adds Intel VT-d specific
> > > > > function to implement iommu passdown invalidate API for
> > > > > shared virtual address.
> > > > >
> > > > > The use case is for supporting caching structure invalidation
> > > > > of assigned SVM capable devices. Emulated IOMMU exposes
> > > > > queue
> > > >
> > > > emulated IOMMU -> vIOMMU, since virito-iommu could use the
> > > > interface as well.
> > > >
> > > True, but it does not invalidate this statement about emulated
> > > IOMMU. I will add another statement saying "the same interface
> > > can be used for virtio-IOMMU as well". OK?
> >
> > sure
> >
> > >
> > > > > invalidation capability and passes down all descriptors from
> > > > > the guest to the physical IOMMU.
> > > > >
> > > > > The assumption is that guest to host device ID mapping should
> > > > > be resolved prior to calling IOMMU driver. Based on the
> > > > > device handle, host IOMMU driver can replace certain fields
> > > > > before submit to the invalidation queue.
> > > > >
> > > > > ---
> > > > > v7 review fixed in v10
> > > > > ---
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Liu, Yi L <yi.l.liu@intel.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c | 182
> > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > 1 file changed, 182 insertions(+)
> > > > >
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> > > > > b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c index b1477cd423dd..a76afb0fd51a
> > > > > 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
> > > > > @@ -5619,6 +5619,187 @@ static void
> > > > > intel_iommu_aux_detach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> > > > > aux_domain_remove_dev(to_dmar_domain(domain), dev);
> > > > > }
> > > > >
> > > > > +/*
> > > > > + * 2D array for converting and sanitizing IOMMU generic TLB
> > > > > granularity to
> > > > > + * VT-d granularity. Invalidation is typically included in
> > > > > the unmap operation
> > > > > + * as a result of DMA or VFIO unmap. However, for assigned
> > > > > devices guest
> > > > > + * owns the first level page tables. Invalidations of
> > > > > translation caches in the
> > > > > + * guest are trapped and passed down to the host.
> > > > > + *
> > > > > + * vIOMMU in the guest will only expose first level page
> > > > > tables, therefore
> > > > > + * we do not include IOTLB granularity for request without
> > > > > PASID (second level).
> > > >
> > > > I would revise above as "We do not support IOTLB granularity for
> > > > request without PASID (second level), therefore any vIOMMU
> > > > implementation that exposes the SVA capability to the guest
> > > > should only expose the first level page tables, implying all
> > > > invalidation requests from the guest will include a valid PASID"
> > > >
> > > Sounds good.
> > >
> > > > > + *
> > > > > + * For example, to find the VT-d granularity encoding for
> > > > > IOTLB
> > > > > + * type and page selective granularity within PASID:
> > > > > + * X: indexed by iommu cache type
> > > > > + * Y: indexed by enum iommu_inv_granularity
> > > > > + * [IOMMU_CACHE_INV_TYPE_IOTLB][IOMMU_INV_GRANU_ADDR]
> > > > > + *
> > > > > + * Granu_map array indicates validity of the table. 1:
> > > > > valid, 0: invalid
> > > > > + *
> > > > > + */
> > > > > +const static int
> > > > >
> > > inv_type_granu_map[IOMMU_CACHE_INV_TYPE_NR][IOMMU_INV_GRANU_
> > > > > NR] = {
> > > > > + /*
> > > > > + * PASID based IOTLB invalidation: PASID selective
> > > > > (per PASID),
> > > > > + * page selective (address granularity)
> > > > > + */
> > > > > + {0, 1, 1},
> > > > > + /* PASID based dev TLBs, only support all PASIDs or
> > > > > single PASID */
> > > > > + {1, 1, 0},
> > > >
> > > > Is this combination correct? when single PASID is being
> > > > specified, it is essentially a page-selective invalidation
> > > > since you need provide Address and Size.
> > > >
> > > This is for translation between generic UAPI granu to VT-d granu,
> > > it has nothing to do with address and size.
> >
> > Generic UAPI defines three granularities: domain, pasid and addr.
> > from the definition domain applies all entries related to did, pasid
> > applies to all entries related to pasid, while addr is specific for
> > a range.
> >
> > from what we just confirmed internally with VT-d spec owner, our
> > PASID based dev TLB invalidation always requires addr and size,
> > while current uAPI doesn't support multiple PASIDs based range
> > invaliation. It sounds to me that you want to use domain to replace
> > multiple PASIDs case (G=1), but it then changes the meaning of
> > the domain granularity and easily lead to confusion.
> >
> > I feel Eric's proposal makes more sense. Here we'd better use {0,
> > 0, 1} to indicate only addr range invalidation is allowed, matching
> > the spec definition. We may use a special flag in
> > iommu_inv_addr_info to indicate G=1 case, if necessary.
>
> I agree. G=1 case should be supported. I think we had a flag for
> global as there is GL bit in p_iotlb_inv_dsc (a.k.a
> ext_iotlb_inv_dsc), but it was dropped as 3.0 spec dropped GL bit.
> Let's add it back as for DevTLB flush case.
>
Make sense. I will change that to

--- a/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/intel-iommu.c
@@ -5741,7 +5741,7 @@ const static int inv_type_granu_map[IOMMU_CACHE_INV_TYPE_NR][IOMMU_INV_GRANU_NR]
*/
{0, 1, 1},
/* PASID based dev TLBs, only support all PASIDs or single PASID */
- {1, 1, 0},
+ {0, 0, 1},
/* PASID cache */
{1, 1, 0}
};
@@ -5750,7 +5750,7 @@ const static int inv_type_granu_table[IOMMU_CACHE_INV_TYPE_NR][IOMMU_INV_GRANU_N
/* PASID based IOTLB */
{0, QI_GRAN_NONG_PASID, QI_GRAN_PSI_PASID},
/* PASID based dev TLBs */
- {QI_DEV_IOTLB_GRAN_ALL, QI_DEV_IOTLB_GRAN_PASID_SEL, 0},
+ {0, 0, QI_DEV_IOTLB_GRAN_PASID_SEL},
/* PASID cache */
{QI_PC_ALL_PASIDS, QI_PC_PASID_SEL, 0},
};

> > > e.g.
> > > If user passes IOMMU_INV_GRANU_PASID for the single PASID case as
> > > you mentioned, this map table shows it is valid.
> > >
> > > Then the lookup result will get VT-d granu:
> > > QI_DEV_IOTLB_GRAN_PASID_SEL, which means G=0.
> > >
> > >
> > > > > + /* PASID cache */
> > > >
> > > > PASID cache is fully managed by the host. Guest PASID cache
> > > > invalidation is interpreted by vIOMMU for bind and unbind
> > > > operations. I don't think we should accept any PASID cache
> > > > invalidation from userspace or guest.
> > > >
> > >
> > > True for vIOMMU, this is here for completeness. Can be used by
> > > virtio IOMMU, since PC flush is inclusive (IOTLB, devTLB), it is
> > > more efficient.
> >
> > I think it is not correct in concept. We should not allow the
> > userspace or guest to request an operation which is beyond its
> > privilege (just because doing so may bring some performance
> > benefit). You can always introduce new cmd for such purpose.
>
> I guess it was added for the pasid table binding case? Now, our
> platform doesn't support it. So I guess we can just make it as
> unsupported in the 2D table.
Sounds good.