From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@windriver.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Jim Somerville <Jim.Somerville@windriver.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/3] isolcpus: affine kernel threads to specified cpumask
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 02:57:08 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200331005706.GA24647@lenoir> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200328152503.225876188@redhat.com>
On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 12:21:19PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> This is a kernel enhancement to configure the cpu affinity of kernel threads via kernel boot option isolcpus=no_kthreads,<isolcpus_params>,<cpulist>
>
> When this option is specified, the cpumask is immediately applied upon
> thread launch. This does not affect kernel threads that specify cpu
> and node.
>
> This allows CPU isolation (that is not allowing certain threads
> to execute on certain CPUs) without using the isolcpus=domain parameter,
> making it possible to enable load balancing on such CPUs
> during runtime (see kernel-parameters.txt).
>
> Note-1: this is based off on Wind River's patch at
> https://github.com/starlingx-staging/stx-integ/blob/master/kernel/kernel-std/centos/patches/affine-compute-kernel-threads.patch
>
> Difference being that this patch is limited to modifying
> kernel thread cpumask: Behaviour of other threads can
> be controlled via cgroups or sched_setaffinity.
>
> Note-2: Wind River's patch was based off Christoph Lameter's patch at
> https://lwn.net/Articles/565932/ with the only difference being
> the kernel parameter changed from kthread to kthread_cpus.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
>
> ---
> Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 8 ++++++++
> include/linux/sched/isolation.h | 1 +
> kernel/kthread.c | 6 ++++--
> kernel/sched/isolation.c | 6 ++++++
> 4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ linux-2.6/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -1959,6 +1959,14 @@
> the CPU affinity syscalls or cpuset.
> <cpu number> begins at 0 and the maximum value is
> "number of CPUs in system - 1".
> + When using cpusets, use the isolcpus option "kthread"
> + to avoid creation of kernel threads on isolated CPUs.
> +
> + kthread
> + Adjust the CPU affinity mask of unbound kernel threads to
> + not contain CPUs on the isolated list. This complements
> + the isolation provided by the cpusets mechanism described
> + above and by managed_irq option.
So, what about what I suggested with having "unbound" instead, which
includes all the CPU-unbound work?
HK_FLAG_WQ | HK_FLAG_TIMER | HK_FLAG_RCU | HK_FLAG_MISC | HK_FLAG_KTHREAD | HK_FLAG_SCHED
(and yes your suggestion of including HK_FLAG_SCHED is good).
Because I don't see the point of exposing kthread isolation alone as an ABI
so far.
Later I suspect I'll turn all these flags into a single HK_FLAG_UNBOUND.
Thanks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-31 0:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-28 15:21 [patch 0/3] affine kernel threads to specified cpumask (v3) Marcelo Tosatti
2020-03-28 15:21 ` [patch 1/3] kthread: switch to cpu_possible_mask Marcelo Tosatti
2020-03-28 15:21 ` [patch 2/3] isolcpus: affine kernel threads to specified cpumask Marcelo Tosatti
2020-03-31 0:57 ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2020-03-31 11:50 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2020-03-31 13:36 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-03-28 15:21 ` [patch 3/3] isolcpus: undeprecate on documentation Marcelo Tosatti
2020-03-31 15:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-03-31 15:41 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2020-03-31 15:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-04 23:05 ` Christopher Lameter
2020-03-31 15:43 ` Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200331005706.GA24647@lenoir \
--to=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=Jim.Somerville@windriver.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chris.friesen@windriver.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox