public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
To: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@windriver.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Jim Somerville <Jim.Somerville@windriver.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/3] isolcpus: affine kernel threads to specified cpumask
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 02:57:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200331005706.GA24647@lenoir> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200328152503.225876188@redhat.com>

On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 12:21:19PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> This is a kernel enhancement to configure the cpu affinity of kernel threads via kernel boot option isolcpus=no_kthreads,<isolcpus_params>,<cpulist>
> 
> When this option is specified, the cpumask is immediately applied upon
> thread launch. This does not affect kernel threads that specify cpu
> and node.
> 
> This allows CPU isolation (that is not allowing certain threads
> to execute on certain CPUs) without using the isolcpus=domain parameter,
> making it possible to enable load balancing on such CPUs
> during runtime (see kernel-parameters.txt).
> 
> Note-1: this is based off on Wind River's patch at
> https://github.com/starlingx-staging/stx-integ/blob/master/kernel/kernel-std/centos/patches/affine-compute-kernel-threads.patch
> 
> Difference being that this patch is limited to modifying
> kernel thread cpumask: Behaviour of other threads can
> be controlled via cgroups or sched_setaffinity.
> 
> Note-2: Wind River's patch was based off Christoph Lameter's patch at
> https://lwn.net/Articles/565932/ with the only difference being
> the kernel parameter changed from kthread to kthread_cpus.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>
> 
> ---
>  Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt |    8 ++++++++
>  include/linux/sched/isolation.h                 |    1 +
>  kernel/kthread.c                                |    6 ++++--
>  kernel/sched/isolation.c                        |    6 ++++++
>  4 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-2.6/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> +++ linux-2.6/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt
> @@ -1959,6 +1959,14 @@
>  			  the CPU affinity syscalls or cpuset.
>  			  <cpu number> begins at 0 and the maximum value is
>  			  "number of CPUs in system - 1".
> +			  When using cpusets, use the isolcpus option "kthread"
> +			  to avoid creation of kernel threads on isolated CPUs.
> +
> +			kthread
> +			  Adjust the CPU affinity mask of unbound kernel threads to
> +			  not contain CPUs on the isolated list. This complements
> +			  the isolation provided by the cpusets mechanism described
> +			  above and by managed_irq option.

So, what about what I suggested with having "unbound" instead, which
includes all the CPU-unbound work?

 HK_FLAG_WQ | HK_FLAG_TIMER | HK_FLAG_RCU | HK_FLAG_MISC | HK_FLAG_KTHREAD | HK_FLAG_SCHED

(and yes your suggestion of including HK_FLAG_SCHED is good).

Because I don't see the point of exposing kthread isolation alone as an ABI
so far.

Later I suspect I'll turn all these flags into a single HK_FLAG_UNBOUND.

Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-31  0:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-28 15:21 [patch 0/3] affine kernel threads to specified cpumask (v3) Marcelo Tosatti
2020-03-28 15:21 ` [patch 1/3] kthread: switch to cpu_possible_mask Marcelo Tosatti
2020-03-28 15:21 ` [patch 2/3] isolcpus: affine kernel threads to specified cpumask Marcelo Tosatti
2020-03-31  0:57   ` Frederic Weisbecker [this message]
2020-03-31 11:50     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2020-03-31 13:36       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2020-03-28 15:21 ` [patch 3/3] isolcpus: undeprecate on documentation Marcelo Tosatti
2020-03-31 15:22   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-03-31 15:41     ` Marcelo Tosatti
2020-03-31 15:57       ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-04 23:05         ` Christopher Lameter
2020-03-31 15:43     ` Frederic Weisbecker

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200331005706.GA24647@lenoir \
    --to=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=Jim.Somerville@windriver.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chris.friesen@windriver.com \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox