Re: [PATCH RFC] mm: remove CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP (was: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] mm: Enable CONFIG_NODES_SPAN_OTHER_NODES by default for NUMA)

Baoquan He
2020-04-10T06:46:46Z

On 04/09/20 at 05:33pm, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 09-04-20 22:41:19, Baoquan He wrote:
> > On 04/02/20 at 10:01am, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > On Wed 01-04-20 10:51:55, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 01:42:27PM +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > > From above information, we can remove HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP, and
> > > > > replace it with CONFIG_NUMA. That sounds more sensible to store nid into
> > > > > memblock when NUMA support is enabled.
> > > >
> > > > Replacing CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP with CONFIG_NUMA will work, but
> > > > this will not help cleaning up the whole node/zone initialization mess and
> > > > we'll be stuck with two implementations.
> > >
> > > Yeah, this is far from optimal.
> > >
> > > > The overhead of enabling HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP is only for init time as
> > > > most architectures will anyway discard the entire memblock, so having it in
> > > > a UMA arch won't be a problem. The only exception is arm that uses
> > > > memblock for pfn_valid(), here we may also think about a solution to
> > > > compensate the addition of nid to the memblock structures.
> > >
> > > Well, we can make memblock_region->nid defined only for CONFIG_NUMA.
> > > memblock_get_region_node would then unconditionally return 0 on UMA.
> > > Essentially the same way we do NUMA for other MM code. I only see few
> > > direct usage of region->nid.
> >
> > Checked code again, seems HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP is selected directly in
> > all ARCHes which support it. Means HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP is enabled by
> > default on those ARCHes, and has no dependency on CONFIG_NUMA at all.
> > E.g on x86, it just calls free_area_init_nodes() in generic code path,
> > while free_area_init_nodes() is defined in CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP
> > ifdeffery scope. So I tend to agree with Mike to remove
> > HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP firstly on all ARCHes. We can check if it's worth
> > only defining memblock_region->nid for CONFIG_NUMA case after
> > HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP is removed.
>
> This can surely go in separate patches. What I meant to say is the
> region->nid is by definition 0 on !CONFIG_NUMA.

I see, thanks.