From: Anthony Iliopoulos <ailiop@suse.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanya.kulkarni@wdc.com>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvmet: add revalidation support to bdev and file backed namespaces
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2020 10:03:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200406080305.GA1329@technoir> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200403064331.GA23270@lst.de>
On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 08:43:31AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 02, 2020 at 09:30:52PM +0200, Anthony Iliopoulos wrote:
> > Add support for detecting capacity changes on nvmet blockdev and file
> > backed namespaces. This allows for emulating and testing online resizing
> > of nvme devices and filesystems on top.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Anthony Iliopoulos <ailiop@suse.com>
>
> I vaguely remember seeing a very similar patch before, is this a repost?
Not a repost, but you're right, apparently there was a similar patch
posted before: 20191008122904.20438-1-m.malygin@yadro.com, which instead
triggers revalidation via configfs.
> > +void nvmet_bdev_ns_revalidate(struct nvmet_ns *ns)
> > +{
> > + loff_t size;
> > +
> > + size = i_size_read(ns->bdev->bd_inode);
> > +
> > + if (ns->size != size)
> > + ns->size = size;
>
> This can be:
>
> ns->size = i_size_read(ns->bdev->bd_inode);
Fixed.
> > +void nvmet_file_ns_revalidate(struct nvmet_ns *ns)
> > +{
> > + struct kstat stat;
> > +
> > + if (!ns->file)
> > + return;
>
> Shouldn't this always be non-NULL?
Right, this would be unset only during nvmet_ns_disable, and by that
time the ns is off the list, so identify should never see this being
non-NULL. Removed.
> > +
> > + if (vfs_getattr(&ns->file->f_path,
> > + &stat, STATX_SIZE, AT_STATX_FORCE_SYNC))
> > + return;
>
> Use up the full line:
>
> if (vfs_getattr(&ns->file->f_path, &stat, STATX_SIZE,
> AT_STATX_FORCE_SYNC))
Fixed.
> Also shouldn't there be error handling? If we can't stat the file
> the namespace is toast.
Indeed, I think it makes sense to fail identify at that point with
NVME_SC_INVALID_NS.
If you'd rather go with this patch instead of the configfs approach,
I'll post a v2 with the fixes, and some associated blktests that
Chaitanya requested.
Thank you all for the reviews!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-06 8:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-02 19:30 [PATCH] nvmet: add revalidation support to bdev and file backed namespaces Anthony Iliopoulos
2020-04-02 22:14 ` Sagi Grimberg
2020-04-03 6:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-06 8:03 ` Anthony Iliopoulos [this message]
2020-04-03 20:23 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2020-04-03 20:28 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2020-04-03 20:29 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2020-04-03 20:32 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200406080305.GA1329@technoir \
--to=ailiop@suse.com \
--cc=chaitanya.kulkarni@wdc.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox