From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Alexandre Chartre <alexandre.chartre@oracle.com>
Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
Julien Thierry <jthierry@redhat.com>,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] objtool: Add support for return trampoline call
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2020 11:31:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200406093143.GH20730@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <27f433a3-6109-9831-5292-3df4155e10fb@oracle.com>
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 10:19:56AM +0200, Alexandre Chartre wrote:
>
> On 4/4/20 5:51 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 04, 2020 at 09:22:32AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > On Sat, Apr 04, 2020 at 03:32:18PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 05:46:20PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 10:17:57AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > > > > > Peter, I think my previous idea for UNWIND_HINT_ADJUST stack_add=8 would
> > > > > > work here?
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes, it would.
> > > >
> > > > Sorry, I have reconsidered. While it will shut up objtool, it will not
> > > > 'work'. That is, the ORC data generated will not correctly unwind.
> > > >
> > > > I'll try and write a longer email tonight.
> > >
> > > Right, that's what I've been trying to say. The ORC data will be
> > > non-deterministic unless we unroll the loop. Or did you mean something
> > > else?
> >
> > The below should result in deterministic code.
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
> > index 07e95dcb40ad..109ee65f4a11 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h
> > @@ -59,8 +59,8 @@
> > jmp 775b; \
> > 774: \
> > dec reg; \
> > - jnz 771b; \
> > - add $(BITS_PER_LONG/8) * nr, sp;
> > + add $(BITS_PER_LONG/8) * $2, sp; \
> > + jnz 771b;
> > #ifdef __ASSEMBLY__
>
> Nice. This works fine and allows to remove ANNOTATE_NOSPEC_ALTERNATIVE when
> using __FILL_RETURN_BUFFER. However this is probably less performant because
> we now have nr/2 add instructions instead of just 1.
Does it actually matter though? That is, can you measure the difference?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-06 9:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-02 8:22 [PATCH 0/7] objtool changes to remove most ANNOTATE_NOSPEC_ALTERNATIVE Alexandre Chartre
2020-04-02 8:22 ` [PATCH 1/7] objtool: is_fentry_call() crashes if call has no destination Alexandre Chartre
2020-04-02 8:22 ` [PATCH 2/7] objtool: Allow branches within the same alternative Alexandre Chartre
2020-04-02 12:03 ` Julien Thierry
2020-04-02 12:38 ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-04-02 8:22 ` [PATCH 3/7] objtool: Add support for intra-function calls Alexandre Chartre
2020-04-02 12:53 ` Julien Thierry
2020-04-02 13:24 ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-04-02 13:38 ` Julien Thierry
2020-04-02 14:56 ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-04-02 15:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-02 15:54 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-03 7:06 ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-04-02 15:49 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-02 17:27 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-03 8:01 ` Julien Thierry
2020-04-03 12:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-03 12:49 ` Julien Thierry
2020-04-03 14:37 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-03 14:44 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-02 8:22 ` [PATCH 4/7] objtool: Add support for return trampoline call Alexandre Chartre
2020-04-02 13:26 ` Julien Thierry
2020-04-02 14:46 ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-04-02 15:31 ` Julien Thierry
2020-04-02 15:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-03 8:11 ` Julien Thierry
2020-04-03 15:17 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-03 15:22 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-03 15:32 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-03 15:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-03 15:55 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-04 13:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-04 14:22 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-04 15:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-06 8:19 ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-04-06 9:31 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2020-04-06 11:03 ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-04-06 14:16 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-02 15:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-03 7:19 ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-04-06 14:34 ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-04-06 14:55 ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-04-02 8:22 ` [PATCH 5/7] x86/speculation: Annotate intra-function calls Alexandre Chartre
2020-04-03 16:05 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-03 16:16 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-03 17:14 ` Alexandre Chartre
2020-04-03 17:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-03 17:24 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-03 18:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-02 8:22 ` [PATCH 6/7] x86/speculation: Annotate retpoline return instructions Alexandre Chartre
2020-04-02 8:22 ` [PATCH 7/7] x86/speculation: Remove most ANNOTATE_NOSPEC_ALTERNATIVE Alexandre Chartre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200406093143.GH20730@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=alexandre.chartre@oracle.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=jthierry@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox