linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org>
To: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
Cc: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com>,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stummala@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] f2fs: fix long latency due to discard during umount
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2020 14:30:24 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200408090024.GC20234@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200403171943.GC68460@google.com>

Hi Jaegeuk,

On Fri, Apr 03, 2020 at 10:19:43AM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 04/01, Sahitya Tummala wrote:
> > Hi Jaegeuk,
> > 
> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 11:46:55AM -0700, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > > On 03/30, Sahitya Tummala wrote:
> > > > F2FS already has a default timeout of 5 secs for discards that
> > > > can be issued during umount, but it can take more than the 5 sec
> > > > timeout if the underlying UFS device queue is already full and there
> > > > are no more available free tags to be used. In that case, submit_bio()
> > > > will wait for the already queued discard requests to complete to get
> > > > a free tag, which can potentially take way more than 5 sec.
> > > > 
> > > > Fix this by submitting the discard requests with REQ_NOWAIT
> > > > flags during umount. This will return -EAGAIN for UFS queue/tag full
> > > > scenario without waiting in the context of submit_bio(). The FS can
> > > > then handle these requests by retrying again within the stipulated
> > > > discard timeout period to avoid long latencies.
> > > 
> > > Sorry, Sahitya, but, do we really need to do like this? How about just
> > > controlling # of outstanding discarding bios in __issue_discard_cmd()?
> > 
> > Do you mean something like this?
> > 
> > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > index 1a62b27..860dd43 100644
> > --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > @@ -1099,7 +1099,7 @@ static void __init_discard_policy(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> >         } else if (discard_type == DPOLICY_FSTRIM) {
> >                 dpolicy->io_aware = false;
> >         } else if (discard_type == DPOLICY_UMOUNT) {
> > -               dpolicy->max_requests = UINT_MAX;
> > +               dpolicy->max_requests = 30;
> 
> Can we use max queue depth of the block device?

I think it should be limited to 8 or 16 as Chao suggested, so that we can have
better control on the given timeout value? Thoughts?

Thanks,

> 
> >                 dpolicy->io_aware = false;
> >                 /* we need to issue all to keep CP_TRIMMED_FLAG */
> >                 dpolicy->granularity = 1;
> > @@ -1470,12 +1470,14 @@ static int __issue_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> >         struct list_head *pend_list;
> >         struct discard_cmd *dc, *tmp;
> >         struct blk_plug plug;
> > -       int i, issued = 0;
> > +       int i, issued;
> >         bool io_interrupted = false;
> > 
> >         if (dpolicy->timeout != 0)
> >                 f2fs_update_time(sbi, dpolicy->timeout);
> > 
> > +retry:
> > +       issued = 0;
> >         for (i = MAX_PLIST_NUM - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
> >                 if (dpolicy->timeout != 0 &&
> >                                 f2fs_time_over(sbi, dpolicy->timeout))
> > @@ -1522,6 +1524,11 @@ static int __issue_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> >                         break;
> >         }
> > 
> > +       if (dpolicy->type == DPOLICY_UMOUNT && issued) {
> > +               __wait_all_discard_cmd(sbi, dpolicy);
> > +               goto retry;
> > +       }
> > +
> >         if (!issued && io_interrupted)
> >                 issued = -1;
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > 
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Sahitya Tummala <stummala@codeaurora.org>
> > > > ---
> > > > v3:
> > > > -Handle the regression reported by Chao with v2.
> > > > -simplify the logic to split the dc with multiple bios incase any bio returns
> > > >  EAGAIN and retry those new dc within 5 sec timeout.
> > > > 
> > > >  fs/f2fs/segment.c | 65 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
> > > >  1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > > > index fb3e531..55d18c7 100644
> > > > --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> > > > @@ -1029,13 +1029,16 @@ static void f2fs_submit_discard_endio(struct bio *bio)
> > > >  	struct discard_cmd *dc = (struct discard_cmd *)bio->bi_private;
> > > >  	unsigned long flags;
> > > >  
> > > > -	dc->error = blk_status_to_errno(bio->bi_status);
> > > > -
> > > >  	spin_lock_irqsave(&dc->lock, flags);
> > > > +	if (!dc->error)
> > > > +		dc->error = blk_status_to_errno(bio->bi_status);
> > > > +
> > > >  	dc->bio_ref--;
> > > > -	if (!dc->bio_ref && dc->state == D_SUBMIT) {
> > > > -		dc->state = D_DONE;
> > > > -		complete_all(&dc->wait);
> > > > +	if (!dc->bio_ref) {
> > > > +		if (dc->error || dc->state == D_SUBMIT) {
> > > > +			dc->state = D_DONE;
> > > > +			complete_all(&dc->wait);
> > > > +		}
> > > >  	}
> > > >  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dc->lock, flags);
> > > >  	bio_put(bio);
> > > > @@ -1124,10 +1127,13 @@ static int __submit_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > > >  	struct discard_cmd_control *dcc = SM_I(sbi)->dcc_info;
> > > >  	struct list_head *wait_list = (dpolicy->type == DPOLICY_FSTRIM) ?
> > > >  					&(dcc->fstrim_list) : &(dcc->wait_list);
> > > > -	int flag = dpolicy->sync ? REQ_SYNC : 0;
> > > > +	int flag;
> > > >  	block_t lstart, start, len, total_len;
> > > >  	int err = 0;
> > > >  
> > > > +	flag = dpolicy->sync ? REQ_SYNC : 0;
> > > > +	flag |= dpolicy->type == DPOLICY_UMOUNT ? REQ_NOWAIT : 0;
> > > > +
> > > >  	if (dc->state != D_PREP)
> > > >  		return 0;
> > > >  
> > > > @@ -1192,10 +1198,6 @@ static int __submit_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > > >  		dc->bio_ref++;
> > > >  		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dc->lock, flags);
> > > >  
> > > > -		atomic_inc(&dcc->queued_discard);
> > > > -		dc->queued++;
> > > > -		list_move_tail(&dc->list, wait_list);
> > > > -
> > > >  		/* sanity check on discard range */
> > > >  		__check_sit_bitmap(sbi, lstart, lstart + len);
> > > >  
> > > > @@ -1203,6 +1205,29 @@ static int __submit_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > > >  		bio->bi_end_io = f2fs_submit_discard_endio;
> > > >  		bio->bi_opf |= flag;
> > > >  		submit_bio(bio);
> > > > +		if (flag & REQ_NOWAIT) {
> > > > +			if (dc->error == -EAGAIN) {
> > > > +				spin_lock_irqsave(&dc->lock, flags);
> > > > +				dc->len -= len;
> > > > +				if (!dc->len) {
> > > > +					dc->len = total_len;
> > > > +					dc->state = D_PREP;
> > > > +					reinit_completion(&dc->wait);
> > > > +				} else {
> > > > +					dcc->undiscard_blks -= total_len;
> > > > +					if (dc->state == D_PARTIAL)
> > > > +						dc->state = D_SUBMIT;
> > > > +				}
> > > > +				err = dc->error;
> > > > +				dc->error = 0;
> > > > +				spin_unlock_irqrestore(&dc->lock, flags);
> > > > +				break;
> > > > +			}
> > > > +		}
> > > > +
> > > > +		atomic_inc(&dcc->queued_discard);
> > > > +		dc->queued++;
> > > > +		list_move_tail(&dc->list, wait_list);
> > > >  
> > > >  		atomic_inc(&dcc->issued_discard);
> > > >  
> > > > @@ -1214,8 +1239,9 @@ static int __submit_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > > >  		len = total_len;
> > > >  	}
> > > >  
> > > > -	if (!err && len)
> > > > -		__update_discard_tree_range(sbi, bdev, lstart, start, len);
> > > > +	if ((!err || err == -EAGAIN) && total_len && dc->start != start)
> > > > +		__update_discard_tree_range(sbi, bdev, lstart, start,
> > > > +					total_len);
> > > >  	return err;
> > > >  }
> > > >  
> > > > @@ -1470,12 +1496,15 @@ static int __issue_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > > >  	struct list_head *pend_list;
> > > >  	struct discard_cmd *dc, *tmp;
> > > >  	struct blk_plug plug;
> > > > -	int i, issued = 0;
> > > > +	int i, err, issued = 0;
> > > >  	bool io_interrupted = false;
> > > > +	bool retry;
> > > >  
> > > >  	if (dpolicy->timeout != 0)
> > > >  		f2fs_update_time(sbi, dpolicy->timeout);
> > > >  
> > > > +retry:
> > > > +	retry = false;
> > > >  	for (i = MAX_PLIST_NUM - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
> > > >  		if (dpolicy->timeout != 0 &&
> > > >  				f2fs_time_over(sbi, dpolicy->timeout))
> > > > @@ -1509,7 +1538,12 @@ static int __issue_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > > >  				break;
> > > >  			}
> > > >  
> > > > -			__submit_discard_cmd(sbi, dpolicy, dc, &issued);
> > > > +			err = __submit_discard_cmd(sbi, dpolicy, dc, &issued);
> > > > +			if (err == -EAGAIN) {
> > > > +				congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC,
> > > > +						DEFAULT_IO_TIMEOUT);
> > > > +				retry = true;
> > > > +			}
> > > >  
> > > >  			if (issued >= dpolicy->max_requests)
> > > >  				break;
> > > > @@ -1522,6 +1556,9 @@ static int __issue_discard_cmd(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > > >  			break;
> > > >  	}
> > > >  
> > > > +	if (retry)
> > > > +		goto retry;
> > > > +
> > > >  	if (!issued && io_interrupted)
> > > >  		issued = -1;
> > > >  
> > > > -- 
> > > > Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
> > > > Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
> > 
> > -- 
> > --
> > Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
> > The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.

-- 
--
Sent by a consultant of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-04-08  9:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-30  6:45 [PATCH v3] f2fs: fix long latency due to discard during umount Sahitya Tummala
2020-03-31 18:46 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2020-04-01  9:22   ` Sahitya Tummala
2020-04-02  9:32     ` Chao Yu
2020-04-03 17:19     ` Jaegeuk Kim
2020-04-08  9:00       ` Sahitya Tummala [this message]
2020-04-09  2:29         ` Jaegeuk Kim
2020-04-09 11:47           ` Sahitya Tummala
2020-04-13 16:52             ` Jaegeuk Kim
2020-04-14 17:45               ` [f2fs-dev] " Jaegeuk Kim

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200408090024.GC20234@codeaurora.org \
    --to=stummala@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yuchao0@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).