From: Clemens Gruber <clemens.gruber@pqgruber.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: phy: marvell: Fix pause frame negotiation
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2020 15:24:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200411132401.GA273086@workstation.tuxnet> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200411091705.GG25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 10:17:05AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 05:43:04PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 23:43:26 +0200 Clemens Gruber wrote:
> > > The negotiation of flow control / pause frame modes was broken since
> > > commit fcf1f59afc67 ("net: phy: marvell: rearrange to use
> > > genphy_read_lpa()") moved the setting of phydev->duplex below the
> > > phy_resolve_aneg_pause call. Due to a check of DUPLEX_FULL in that
> > > function, phydev->pause was no longer set.
> > >
> > > Fix it by moving the parsing of the status variable before the blocks
> > > dealing with the pause frames.
> > >
> > > Fixes: fcf1f59afc67 ("net: phy: marvell: rearrange to use genphy_read_lpa()")
> > > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.6+
> >
> > nit: please don't CC stable on networking patches
> >
> > > Signed-off-by: Clemens Gruber <clemens.gruber@pqgruber.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/net/phy/marvell.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++--------------------
> > > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/marvell.c b/drivers/net/phy/marvell.c
> > > index 4714ca0e0d4b..02cde4c0668c 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/net/phy/marvell.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/net/phy/marvell.c
> > > @@ -1263,6 +1263,28 @@ static int marvell_read_status_page_an(struct phy_device *phydev,
> > > int lpa;
> > > int err;
> > >
> > > + if (!(status & MII_M1011_PHY_STATUS_RESOLVED))
> > > + return 0;
> >
> > If we return early here won't we miss updating the advertising bits?
> > We will no longer call e.g. fiber_lpa_mod_linkmode_lpa_t().
> >
> > Perhaps extracting info from status should be moved to a helper so we
> > can return early without affecting the rest of the flow?
> >
> > Is my understanding correct? Russell?
>
> You are correct - and yes, there is also a problem here.
>
> It is not clear whether the resolved bit is set before or after the
> link status reports that link is up - however, the resolved bit
> indicates whether the speed and duplex are valid.
I assumed that in the fiber case, the link status register won't be 1
until autonegotiation is complete. There is a part in the 88E1510
datasheet on page 57 [2.6.2], which says so but it's in the Fiber/Copper
Auto-Selection chapter and I am not sure if that's true in general. (?)
(For copper, we call genphy_update_link, which sets phydev->link to 0 if
autoneg is enabled && !completed. And according to the datasheet,
the resolved bit is set when autonegotiation is completed || disabled)
TL/DR:
It's probably a good idea to force link to 0 to be sure, as you
suggested below. I will send a v2 with that change.
Moving the extraction of info to a helper is probably better left to a
separate patch?
> What I've done elsewhere is if the resolved bit is not set, then we
> force phydev->link to be false, so we don't attempt to process a
> link-up status until we can read the link parameters. I think that's
> what needs to happen here, i.o.w.:
>
> if (!(status & MII_M1011_PHY_STATUS_RESOLVED)) {
> phydev->link = 0;
> return 0;
> }
>
> especially as we're not reading the LPA.
Thanks,
Clemens
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-11 13:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-08 21:43 [PATCH] net: phy: marvell: Fix pause frame negotiation Clemens Gruber
2020-04-11 0:43 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-04-11 9:17 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-04-11 13:24 ` Clemens Gruber [this message]
2020-04-11 13:43 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-04-11 14:48 ` Clemens Gruber
2020-04-12 17:03 ` Clemens Gruber
2020-04-12 18:54 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200411132401.GA273086@workstation.tuxnet \
--to=clemens.gruber@pqgruber.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox