public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it>,
	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
	Wei Wang <wvw@google.com>, Alessio Balsini <balsini@google.com>,
	Pavan Kondeti <pkondeti@codeaurora.org>,
	Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@matbug.net>,
	Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
	Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
	Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] sched/topology: Store root domain CPU capacity sum
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2020 13:45:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200414124503.GA236568@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKfTPtDS_qwPH+TwoFWPz6QRzG1N=t46ZvGN=w6zbOtnGAdOeQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Wednesday 08 Apr 2020 at 19:03:57 (+0200), Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Or we can do the opposite and only use capacity_orig_of()/rq->cpu_capacity_orig.
> 
> Is there a case where the max cpu capacity changes over time ? So I
> would prefer to use cpu_capacity_orig which is a field of scheduler
> instead of always calling an external arch specific function

Note however that using arch_scale_cpu_capacity() would be more
efficient, especially on non-arm/arm64 systems where it is a
compile-time constant.

It's probably a matter of personal taste, but I find rq->cpu_capacity_orig
superfluous. It wastes space without actually giving you anything no?
Anybody remembers why it was introduced in the first place?

Thanks,
Quentin

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-04-14 12:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-04-08  9:50 [PATCH 0/4] Capacity awareness for SCHED_DEADLINE Dietmar Eggemann
2020-04-08  9:50 ` [PATCH 1/4] sched/topology: Store root domain CPU capacity sum Dietmar Eggemann
2020-04-08 12:29   ` Vincent Guittot
2020-04-08 16:30     ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-04-08 17:03       ` Vincent Guittot
2020-04-09 13:50         ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-04-09 14:13           ` Vincent Guittot
2020-04-14  9:20             ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-04-14 12:45         ` Quentin Perret [this message]
2020-04-14 15:27           ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-04-14 15:43             ` Vincent Guittot
2020-04-08  9:50 ` [PATCH 2/4] sched/deadline: Improve admission control for asymmetric CPU capacities Dietmar Eggemann
2020-04-08 10:42   ` Valentin Schneider
2020-04-08 12:26     ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-04-08 13:30     ` luca abeni
2020-04-08 14:23       ` Qais Yousef
2020-04-08 15:01       ` Valentin Schneider
2020-04-09 17:29         ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-04-14 11:40           ` Qais Yousef
2020-04-14 14:29             ` Valentin Schneider
2020-04-14 15:41               ` Qais Yousef
2020-04-14 14:28           ` Valentin Schneider
2020-04-17 12:19           ` Juri Lelli
2020-04-17 14:55             ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-04-17 15:08               ` Juri Lelli
2020-04-17 15:47                 ` Juri Lelli
2020-04-08  9:50 ` [PATCH 3/4] sched/deadline: Make DL capacity-aware Dietmar Eggemann
2020-04-10 12:52   ` Juri Lelli
2020-04-15  9:39     ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-04-15 13:20       ` Juri Lelli
2020-04-15 16:42         ` luca abeni
2020-04-16 13:19           ` Juri Lelli
2020-04-08  9:50 ` [PATCH 4/4] sched/deadline: Implement fallback mechanism for !fit case Dietmar Eggemann
2020-04-09 10:25   ` Qais Yousef
2020-04-09 13:00     ` luca abeni
2020-04-09 14:55       ` Qais Yousef
2020-04-09 18:43         ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-04-14 11:29           ` Qais Yousef

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200414124503.GA236568@google.com \
    --to=qperret@google.com \
    --cc=balsini@google.com \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luca.abeni@santannapisa.it \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=patrick.bellasi@matbug.net \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pkondeti@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=qais.yousef@arm.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=wvw@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox