From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Sowjanya Komatineni <skomatineni@nvidia.com>
Cc: adrian.hunter@intel.com, ulf.hansson@linaro.org,
baolin.wang@linaro.org, kstewart@linuxfoundation.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, bradleybolen@gmail.com, faiz_abbas@ti.com,
thierry.reding@gmail.com, jonathanh@nvidia.com,
bbiswas@nvidia.com, anrao@nvidia.com,
linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19.113 0/3] Fix for long operation cmds busy detection
Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2020 09:20:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200419072030.GB3544449@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1587150844-12003-1-git-send-email-skomatineni@nvidia.com>
On Fri, Apr 17, 2020 at 12:14:01PM -0700, Sowjanya Komatineni wrote:
> This series includes manually backported changes that implements Tegra
> specific timeout callback to switch between finite and infinite HW busy
> detection wait modes.
>
> sdhci-tegra driver patch implements set_timeout callback based on one of
> the sdhci host driver patch that refactors sdhci_set_timeout and allows
> drivers to call __sdhci_set_timeout with their timeout callback
> implementation.
>
> Both of these patches are manually backported in this series.
Is this a bugfix or a new feature? I can't tell, but it feels like it's
a new feature. What's wrong with just using the 5.4.y kernel tree?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-19 7:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-17 19:14 [PATCH 4.19.113 0/3] Fix for long operation cmds busy detection Sowjanya Komatineni
2020-04-17 19:14 ` [PATCH 4.19.113 1/3] mmc: sdhci: Refactor sdhci_set_timeout() Sowjanya Komatineni
2020-04-17 19:14 ` [PATCH 4.19.113 2/3] sdhci: tegra: Implement Tegra specific set_timeout callback Sowjanya Komatineni
2020-04-17 19:14 ` [PATCH 4.19.113 3/3] sdhci: tegra: Enable MMC_CAP_WAIT_WHILE_BUSY host capability Sowjanya Komatineni
2020-04-19 7:20 ` Greg KH [this message]
2020-04-19 16:23 ` [PATCH 4.19.113 0/3] Fix for long operation cmds busy detection Sowjanya Komatineni
2020-04-19 16:52 ` Greg KH
2020-04-20 7:01 ` Ulf Hansson
2020-04-21 17:04 ` Sowjanya Komatineni
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-04-24 20:06 Sowjanya Komatineni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200419072030.GB3544449@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=anrao@nvidia.com \
--cc=baolin.wang@linaro.org \
--cc=bbiswas@nvidia.com \
--cc=bradleybolen@gmail.com \
--cc=faiz_abbas@ti.com \
--cc=jonathanh@nvidia.com \
--cc=kstewart@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=skomatineni@nvidia.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox