From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76984C2BA2B for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 08:06:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A33421744 for ; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 08:06:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1725970AbgDSIGs (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Apr 2020 04:06:48 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:35721 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725903AbgDSIGs (ORCPT ); Sun, 19 Apr 2020 04:06:48 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 820AB68BEB; Sun, 19 Apr 2020 10:06:46 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 19 Apr 2020 10:06:46 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Christophe Leroy Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , Alexander Viro , Arnd Bergmann , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jeremy Kerr , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "Eric W . Biederman" Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/8] exec: open code copy_string_kernel Message-ID: <20200419080646.GE12222@lst.de> References: <20200414070142.288696-1-hch@lst.de> <20200414070142.288696-9-hch@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Apr 18, 2020 at 10:15:42AM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote: > > > Le 14/04/2020 à 09:01, Christoph Hellwig a écrit : >> Currently copy_string_kernel is just a wrapper around copy_strings that >> simplifies the calling conventions and uses set_fs to allow passing a >> kernel pointer. But due to the fact the we only need to handle a single >> kernel argument pointer, the logic can be sigificantly simplified while >> getting rid of the set_fs. > > > Instead of duplicating almost identical code, can you write a function that > takes whether the source is from user or from kernel, then you just do > things like: > > if (from_user) > len = strnlen_user(str, MAX_ARG_STRLEN); > else > len = strnlen(str, MAX_ARG_STRLEN); > > > if (from_user) > copy_from_user(kaddr+offset, str, bytes_to_copy); > else > memcpy(kaddr+offset, str, bytes_to_copy); We'll need two different str variables then with and without __user annotations to keep type safety. And introduce a branch-y and unreadable mess in the exec fast path instead of adding a simple and well understood function for the kernel case that just deals with the much simpler case of just copying a single arg vector from a kernel address.