From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] objtool: optimize insn_hash for split sections
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2020 13:13:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202004211313.8B7F529CE@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200421194749.GX20730@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 09:47:49PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 11:07:23AM -0700, Sami Tolvanen wrote:
> > When running objtool on vmlinux.o compiled with -ffunction-sections,
> > we end up with a ton of collisions in the insn_hash table as each
> > function is in its own section. This results in a runtime of minutes
> > instead of seconds. Use both section index and offset as the key to
> > avoid this, similarly to rela_hash.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
>
> I already have this queued:
>
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200416115119.227240432@infradead.org
>
> which looks very similar.
Ah! Yeah, just no insn-arg helper to do the hash call; cool.
Please consider both:
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-21 20:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-21 18:07 [PATCH 0/3] objtool: add support for >64k sections Sami Tolvanen
2020-04-21 18:07 ` [PATCH 1/3] objtool: use gelf_getsymshndx to handle " Sami Tolvanen
2020-04-21 20:11 ` Kees Cook
2020-04-21 18:07 ` [PATCH 2/3] objtool: optimize insn_hash for split sections Sami Tolvanen
2020-04-21 19:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-21 20:13 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2020-04-21 20:20 ` Sami Tolvanen
2020-04-21 18:07 ` [PATCH 3/3] objtool: optimize add_dead_ends " Sami Tolvanen
2020-04-21 20:13 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-04-21 20:17 ` Kees Cook
2020-04-21 22:02 ` Sami Tolvanen
2020-04-21 20:14 ` Kees Cook
2020-04-21 20:11 ` [PATCH 0/3] objtool: add support for >64k sections Kees Cook
2020-04-21 22:08 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " Sami Tolvanen
2020-04-21 22:08 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] objtool: use gelf_getsymshndx to handle " Sami Tolvanen
2020-05-15 17:22 ` [tip: objtool/core] " tip-bot2 for Sami Tolvanen
2020-04-21 22:08 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] objtool: optimize add_dead_ends for split sections Sami Tolvanen
2020-04-21 23:43 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-15 17:22 ` [tip: objtool/core] " tip-bot2 for Sami Tolvanen
2020-04-21 23:52 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] objtool: add support for >64k sections Josh Poimboeuf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202004211313.8B7F529CE@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox