From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86EFFC2BA1A for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 06:52:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B5132166E for ; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 06:52:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726647AbgDXGw5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Apr 2020 02:52:57 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:33420 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725898AbgDXGw5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Apr 2020 02:52:57 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id D49B568CEC; Fri, 24 Apr 2020 08:52:53 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2020 08:52:53 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Jan Kara Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Jens Axboe , Tim Waugh , Borislav Petkov , Jan Kara , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7] isofs: stop using ioctl_by_bdev Message-ID: <20200424065253.GB23754@lst.de> References: <20200423071224.500849-1-hch@lst.de> <20200423071224.500849-7-hch@lst.de> <20200423110347.GE3737@quack2.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200423110347.GE3737@quack2.suse.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 01:03:47PM +0200, Jan Kara wrote: > There's no error handling in the caller and this function actually returns > unsigned int... So I believe you need to return 0 here to maintain previous > behavior (however suspicious it may be)? Indeed, and I don't think it is suspicious at all - if we have no CDROM info we should assume session 0, which is the same as for non-CDROM devices. Fixed for the next version.