[PATCH] :ssb sprom.c: Fixed block comments coding style issues

John Oldman
2020-04-24T17:50:55Z

Fixed coding style issues

Signed-off-by: John Oldman <john.oldman@polehill.co.uk>
---
drivers/ssb/sprom.c | 12 ++++++++----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/ssb/sprom.c b/drivers/ssb/sprom.c
index 52d2e0f33be7..42d620cee8a9 100644
--- a/drivers/ssb/sprom.c
+++ b/drivers/ssb/sprom.c
@@ -78,7 +78,8 @@ ssize_t ssb_attr_sprom_show(struct ssb_bus *bus, char *buf,

/* Use interruptible locking, as the SPROM write might
* be holding the lock for several seconds. So allow userspace
- * to cancel operation. */
+ * to cancel operation.
+ */
err = -ERESTARTSYS;
if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&bus->sprom_mutex))
goto out_kfree;
@@ -121,7 +122,8 @@ ssize_t ssb_attr_sprom_store(struct ssb_bus *bus,

/* Use interruptible locking, as the SPROM write might
* be holding the lock for several seconds. So allow userspace
- * to cancel operation. */
+ * to cancel operation.
+ */
err = -ERESTARTSYS;
if (mutex_lock_interruptible(&bus->sprom_mutex))
goto out_kfree;
@@ -188,9 +190,11 @@ int ssb_fill_sprom_with_fallback(struct ssb_bus *bus, struct ssb_sprom *out)
bool ssb_is_sprom_available(struct ssb_bus *bus)
{
/* status register only exists on chipcomon rev >= 11 and we need check
- for >= 31 only */
+ * for >= 31 only
+ */
/* this routine differs from specs as we do not access SPROM directly
- on PCMCIA */
+ * on PCMCIA
+ */
if (bus->bustype == SSB_BUSTYPE_PCI &&
bus->chipco.dev && /* can be unavailable! */
bus->chipco.dev->id.revision >= 31)
--
2.17.1