From: Niklas Cassel <Niklas.Cassel@wdc.com>
To: "Javier González" <javier@javigon.com>
Cc: "Keith Busch" <kbusch@kernel.org>, "Jens Axboe" <axboe@fb.com>,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@lst.de>,
"Sagi Grimberg" <sagi@grimberg.me>,
"Igor Konopko" <igor.j.konopko@intel.com>,
"Matias Bjørling" <mb@lightnvm.io>,
"Jens Axboe" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: prevent double free in nvme_alloc_ns() error handling
Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2020 18:22:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200427182245.GA547726@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200427180311.nssquibbak5ib4oo@mpHalley.localdomain>
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 08:03:11PM +0200, Javier González wrote:
> On 27.04.2020 14:34, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> > When jumping to the out_put_disk label, we will call put_disk(), which will
> > trigger a call to disk_release(), which calls blk_put_queue().
> >
> > Later in the cleanup code, we do blk_cleanup_queue(), which will also call
> > blk_put_queue().
> >
> > Putting the queue twice is incorrect, and will generate a KASAN splat.
> >
> > Set the disk->queue pointer to NULL, before calling put_disk(), so that the
> > first call to blk_put_queue() will not free the queue.
> >
> > The second call to blk_put_queue() uses another pointer to the same queue,
> > so this call will still free the queue.
> >
> > Fixes: 85136c010285 ("lightnvm: simplify geometry enumeration")
> > Signed-off-by: Niklas Cassel <niklas.cassel@wdc.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 2 ++
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> > index 91c1bd659947..f2adea96b04c 100644
> > --- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> > @@ -3642,6 +3642,8 @@ static void nvme_alloc_ns(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, unsigned nsid)
> >
> > return;
> > out_put_disk:
> > + /* prevent double queue cleanup */
> > + ns->disk->queue = NULL;
> > put_disk(ns->disk);
> > out_unlink_ns:
> > mutex_lock(&ctrl->subsys->lock);
> > --
> > 2.25.3
> >
> What about delaying the assignment of ns->disk?
>
> diff --git i/drivers/nvme/host/core.c w/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> index a4d8c90ee7cc..6da4a9ced945 100644
> --- i/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> +++ w/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
> @@ -3541,7 +3541,6 @@ static int nvme_alloc_ns(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, unsigned nsid)
> disk->queue = ns->queue;
> disk->flags = flags;
> memcpy(disk->disk_name, disk_name, DISK_NAME_LEN);
> - ns->disk = disk;
>
> __nvme_revalidate_disk(disk, id);
>
> @@ -3553,6 +3552,8 @@ static int nvme_alloc_ns(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, unsigned nsid)
> }
> }
>
> + ns->disk = disk;
> +
Hello Javier!
The only case where we jump to the out_put_disk label, is if the
nvme_nvm_register() call failed.
In that case, we want to undo the alloc_disk_node() operation, i.e.,
decrease the refcount.
If we don't set "ns->disk = disk;" before the call to nvme_nvm_register(),
then, if register fails, and we jump to the put_disk(ns->disk) label,
ns->disk will be NULL, so the recount will not be decreased, so I assume
that this memory would then be a memory leak.
I think that the problem is that the block functions are a bit messy.
Most drivers seem to do blk_cleanup_queue() first and then do put_disk(),
but some drivers do it in the opposite way, so I think that we might have
some more use-after-free bugs in some of these drivers that do it in the
opposite way.
Kind regards,
Niklas
> down_write(&ctrl->namespaces_rwsem);
> list_add_tail(&ns->list, &ctrl->namespaces);
> up_write(&ctrl->namespaces_rwsem);
>
>
> Javier
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-27 18:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-27 12:34 [PATCH] nvme: prevent double free in nvme_alloc_ns() error handling Niklas Cassel
2020-04-27 15:06 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-04-27 18:03 ` Javier González
2020-04-27 18:22 ` Niklas Cassel [this message]
2020-04-28 7:06 ` Javier González
2020-04-28 7:49 ` Niklas Cassel
2020-04-28 10:32 ` Javier González
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200427182245.GA547726@localhost.localdomain \
--to=niklas.cassel@wdc.com \
--cc=axboe@fb.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=igor.j.konopko@intel.com \
--cc=javier@javigon.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mb@lightnvm.io \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox