From: Pavan Kondeti <pkondeti@codeaurora.org>
To: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Luca Abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
Wei Wang <wvw@google.com>, Quentin Perret <qperret@google.com>,
Alessio Balsini <balsini@google.com>,
Patrick Bellasi <patrick.bellasi@matbug.net>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@arm.com>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] sched/deadline: Optimize dl_bw_cpus()
Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2020 16:25:15 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200430105514.GC19464@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200427083709.30262-3-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 10:37:05AM +0200, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> Return the weight of the rd (root domain) span in case it is a subset
> of the cpu_active_mask.
>
> Continue to compute the number of CPUs over rd span and cpu_active_mask
> when in hotplug.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/deadline.c | 8 +++++++-
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> index 504d2f51b0d6..4ae22bfc37ae 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
> @@ -54,10 +54,16 @@ static inline struct dl_bw *dl_bw_of(int i)
> static inline int dl_bw_cpus(int i)
> {
> struct root_domain *rd = cpu_rq(i)->rd;
> - int cpus = 0;
> + int cpus;
>
> RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_read_lock_sched_held(),
> "sched RCU must be held");
> +
> + if (cpumask_subset(rd->span, cpu_active_mask))
> + return cpumask_weight(rd->span);
> +
Looks good to me. This is a nice optimization.
> + cpus = 0;
> +
> for_each_cpu_and(i, rd->span, cpu_active_mask)
> cpus++;
>
Do you know why this check is in place? Is it only to cover
the case of cpuset_cpu_inactive()->dl_cpu_busy()?
Thanks,
Pavan
> --
> 2.17.1
>
--
Qualcomm India Private Limited, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-30 10:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-27 8:37 [PATCH v2 0/6] Capacity awareness for SCHED_DEADLINE Dietmar Eggemann
2020-04-27 8:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] sched/topology: Store root domain CPU capacity sum Dietmar Eggemann
2020-04-27 8:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] sched/deadline: Optimize dl_bw_cpus() Dietmar Eggemann
2020-04-30 10:55 ` Pavan Kondeti [this message]
2020-05-01 16:12 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-04-27 8:37 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] sched/deadline: Add dl_bw_capacity() Dietmar Eggemann
2020-05-06 10:54 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-05-06 12:37 ` Juri Lelli
2020-05-06 15:09 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-05-11 8:01 ` Juri Lelli
2020-05-12 12:39 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-05-15 12:26 ` Juri Lelli
2020-04-27 8:37 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] sched/deadline: Improve admission control for asymmetric CPU capacities Dietmar Eggemann
2020-04-27 8:37 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] sched/deadline: Make DL capacity-aware Dietmar Eggemann
2020-04-30 13:10 ` Pavan Kondeti
2020-05-01 16:12 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-05-04 3:58 ` Pavan Kondeti
2020-05-05 18:02 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-04-27 8:37 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] sched/deadline: Implement fallback mechanism for !fit case Dietmar Eggemann
2020-04-27 13:34 ` Juri Lelli
2020-04-27 14:17 ` luca abeni
2020-04-29 17:39 ` Dietmar Eggemann
2020-04-30 11:00 ` Pavan Kondeti
2020-05-01 16:12 ` Dietmar Eggemann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200430105514.GC19464@codeaurora.org \
--to=pkondeti@codeaurora.org \
--cc=balsini@google.com \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luca.abeni@santannapisa.it \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
--cc=patrick.bellasi@matbug.net \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=qais.yousef@arm.com \
--cc=qperret@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=wvw@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox