public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	mhiramat@kernel.org, bristot@redhat.com, jbaron@akamai.com,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	mingo@kernel.org, namit@vmware.com, hpa@zytor.com,
	luto@kernel.org, ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, jpoimboe@redhat.com,
	pbonzini@redhat.com, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/18] notifier: Fix broken error handling pattern
Date: Fri, 1 May 2020 19:35:02 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200501193502.7c9b2b10@oasis.local.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200501202943.837409514@infradead.org>

On Fri, 01 May 2020 22:28:50 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:

> The current notifiers have the following error handling pattern all
> over the place:
> 
> 	int err, nr;
> 
> 	err = __foo_notifier_call_chain(&chain, val_up, v, -1, &nr);
> 	if (err & NOTIFIER_STOP_MASK)
> 		__foo_notifier_call_chain(&chain, val_down, v, nr-1, NULL)
> 
> And aside from the endless repetition thereof, it is broken. Consider
> blocking notifiers; both calls take and drop the rwsem, this means
> that the notifier list can change in between the two calls, making @nr
> meaningless.
> 
> Fix this by replacing all the __foo_notifier_call_chain() functions
> with foo_notifier_call_chain_robust() that embeds the above pattern,
> but ensures it is inside a single lock region.
> 
> Note: I switched atomic_notifier_call_chain_robust() to use
>       the spinlock, since RCU cannot provide the guarantee
>       required for the recovery.
> 
> Note: software_resume() error handling was broken afaict.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/notifier.h           |   15 +--
>  kernel/cpu_pm.c                    |   48 ++++--------
>  kernel/notifier.c                  |  144 ++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
>  kernel/power/hibernate.c           |   26 +++---
>  kernel/power/main.c                |    8 +-
>  kernel/power/power.h               |    3 
>  kernel/power/suspend.c             |   14 +--
>  kernel/power/user.c                |   14 +--
>  tools/power/pm-graph/sleepgraph.py |    2 
>  9 files changed, 141 insertions(+), 133 deletions(-)
> 

This looks like something that can go in outside this series.

-- Steve

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-01 23:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 60+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-01 20:28 [PATCH v4 00/18] Add static_call() Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-01 20:28 ` [PATCH v4 01/18] notifier: Fix broken error handling pattern Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-01 23:35   ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2020-05-01 20:28 ` [PATCH v4 02/18] module: Fix up module_notifier return values Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-01 20:28 ` [PATCH v4 03/18] module: Properly propagate MODULE_STATE_COMING failure Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-01 20:28 ` [PATCH v4 04/18] jump_label,module: Fix module lifetime for __jump_label_mod_text_reserved Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-01 20:28 ` [PATCH v4 05/18] compiler.h: Make __ADDRESSABLE() symbol truly unique Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-01 20:28 ` [PATCH v4 06/18] static_call: Add basic static call infrastructure Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-05 21:21   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-05-01 20:28 ` [PATCH v4 07/18] static_call: Add inline " Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-05 22:10   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-05-06 16:15     ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-01 20:28 ` [PATCH v4 08/18] static_call: Avoid kprobes on inline static_call()s Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-01 20:28 ` [PATCH v4 09/18] x86/static_call: Add out-of-line static call implementation Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-06 16:16   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-01 20:28 ` [PATCH v4 10/18] x86/static_call: Add inline static call implementation for x86-64 Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-01 20:29 ` [PATCH v4 11/18] static_call: Simple self-test Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-01 20:29 ` [PATCH v4 12/18] tracepoint: Optimize using static_call() Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-13  8:48   ` [tracepoint] 01edfaf177: WARNING:at_kernel/static_call.c:#__static_call_update kernel test robot
2020-05-15 17:13     ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-01 20:29 ` [PATCH v4 13/18] x86/alternatives: Teach text_poke_bp() to emulate RET Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-01 20:29 ` [PATCH v4 14/18] static_call: Add static_cond_call() Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-02 13:08   ` Rasmus Villemoes
2020-05-03 12:58     ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-04  7:20       ` Rasmus Villemoes
2020-05-04 20:14         ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-05  7:50           ` Rasmus Villemoes
2020-05-05  9:38             ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-05  9:36           ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-05 18:13             ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-05-05 18:27               ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-05-05 18:48                 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-05-05 19:00                   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-05-05 19:57                     ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-05-05 20:27                       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-05-06 13:55                         ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-06 14:01                           ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-05-06 16:18                             ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-06 13:51               ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-06 16:00                 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-06 17:16                 ` Linus Torvalds
2020-05-06 19:57                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-05-06 17:24   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-05-06 17:58     ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-06 18:09       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-05-06 18:16         ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-08 15:27     ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-08 15:47       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-05-08 16:17         ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-01 20:29 ` [PATCH v4 15/18] static_call: Handle tail-calls Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-06 18:10   ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-01 20:29 ` [PATCH v4 16/18] static_call: Allow early init Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-06 21:15   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-05-08 13:31     ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-08 14:27       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2020-05-08 15:30         ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-01 20:29 ` [PATCH v4 17/18] x86/perf, static_call: Optimize x86_pmu methods Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-01 20:29 ` [PATCH v4 18/18] objtool: Clean up elf_write() condition Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-06 17:32 ` [PATCH v4 00/18] Add static_call() Josh Poimboeuf
2020-05-06 18:05   ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200501193502.7c9b2b10@oasis.local.home \
    --to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=bristot@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=namit@vmware.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox