public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the btrfs tree with the btrfs-fixes tree
Date: Sun, 3 May 2020 23:40:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200503214040.GR18421@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200501102825.431f9cac@canb.auug.org.au>

On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 10:28:25AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the btrfs tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   fs/btrfs/tree-log.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   f135cea30de5 ("btrfs: fix partial loss of prealloc extent past i_size after fsync")
> 
> from the btrfs-fixes tree and commit:
> 
>   e94d318f12cd ("btrfs: fix partial loss of prealloc extent past i_size after fsync")

Conflicts in the above commit and "btrfs: force chunk allocation if our
global rsv is larger than metadata" should be gone now. Both patches
have been merged to master and fresh for-next branch pushed to k.org.

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-03 21:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-01  0:28 linux-next: manual merge of the btrfs tree with the btrfs-fixes tree Stephen Rothwell
2020-05-03 21:40 ` David Sterba [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-03-24 13:25 Mark Brown
2026-03-24 13:25 Mark Brown
2026-03-17 13:48 Mark Brown
2026-03-17 13:48 Mark Brown
2026-03-17 13:48 Mark Brown
2025-09-18 11:26 Mark Brown
2024-06-06 22:55 Stephen Rothwell
2024-06-06 23:12 ` Qu Wenruo
2023-10-04 23:09 Stephen Rothwell
2022-10-31 23:28 Stephen Rothwell
2022-09-05 23:50 Stephen Rothwell
2022-09-06  0:15 ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-09-06 19:41   ` David Sterba
2022-03-24 23:48 Stephen Rothwell
2022-02-24 13:44 broonie
2022-02-25 11:59 ` David Sterba
2021-01-10 22:29 Stephen Rothwell
2020-05-01  0:24 Stephen Rothwell
2020-05-01  1:05 ` Stephen Rothwell
2020-05-01  2:06   ` Qu Wenruo
2020-01-08 22:14 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200503214040.GR18421@suse.cz \
    --to=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=fdmanana@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox