Re: [PATCH 19/24] rcu/tree: Support reclaim for head-less object

Uladzislau Rezki
2020-05-04T12:57:15Z

On Fri, May 01, 2020 at 03:39:09PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 10:58:58PM +0200, Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) wrote:
> > Update the kvfree_call_rcu() with head-less support, it
> > means an object without any rcu_head structure can be
> > reclaimed after GP.
> >
> > To store pointers there are two chain-arrays maintained
> > one for SLAB and another one is for vmalloc. Both types
> > of objects(head-less variant and regular one) are placed
> > there based on the type.
> >
> > It can be that maintaining of arrays becomes impossible
> > due to high memory pressure. For such reason there is an
> > emergency path. In that case objects with rcu_head inside
> > are just queued building one way list. Later on that list
> > is drained.
> >
> > As for head-less variant. Such objects do not have any
> > rcu_head helper inside. Thus it is dynamically attached.
> > As a result an object consists of back-pointer and regular
> > rcu_head. It implies that emergency path can detect such
> > object type, therefore they are tagged. So a back-pointer
> > could be freed as well as dynamically attached wrapper.
> >
> > Even though such approach requires dynamic memory it needs
> > only sizeof(unsigned long *) + sizeof(struct rcu_head) bytes,
> > thus SLAB is used to obtain it. Finally if attaching of the
> > rcu_head and queuing get failed, the current context has
> > to follow might_sleep() annotation, thus below steps could
> > be applied:
> > a) wait until a grace period has elapsed;
> > b) direct inlining of the kvfree() call.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
> > Co-developed-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
> > ---
> > kernel/rcu/tree.c | 102 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > 1 file changed, 98 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > index 51726e4c3b4d..501cac02146d 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> > @@ -3072,15 +3072,31 @@ static void kfree_rcu_work(struct work_struct *work)
> > */
> > for (; head; head = next) {
> > unsigned long offset = (unsigned long)head->func;
> > - void *ptr = (void *)head - offset;
> > + bool headless;
> > + void *ptr;
> >
> > next = head->next;
> > +
> > + /* We tag the headless object, if so adjust offset. */
> > + headless = (((unsigned long) head - offset) & BIT(0));
> > + if (headless)
> > + offset -= 1;
> > +
> > + ptr = (void *) head - offset;
> > +
> > debug_rcu_head_unqueue((struct rcu_head *)ptr);
> > rcu_lock_acquire(&rcu_callback_map);
> > trace_rcu_invoke_kvfree_callback(rcu_state.name, head, offset);
> >
> > - if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(!__is_kvfree_rcu_offset(offset)))
> > + if (!WARN_ON_ONCE(!__is_kvfree_rcu_offset(offset))) {
> > + /*
> > + * If headless free the back-pointer first.
> > + */
> > + if (headless)
> > + kvfree((void *) *((unsigned long *) ptr));
> > +
> > kvfree(ptr);
> > + }
> >
> > rcu_lock_release(&rcu_callback_map);
> > cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs();
> > @@ -3221,6 +3237,13 @@ kvfree_call_rcu_add_ptr_to_bulk(struct kfree_rcu_cpu *krcp, void *ptr)
> > if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT))
> > return false;
> >
> > + /*
> > + * TODO: For one argument of kvfree_rcu() we can
> > + * drop the lock and get the page in sleepable
> > + * context. That would allow to maintain an array
> > + * for the CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT as well. Thus we could
> > + * get rid of dynamic rcu_head attaching code.
> > + */
> > bnode = (struct kvfree_rcu_bulk_data *)
> > __get_free_page(GFP_NOWAIT | __GFP_NOWARN);
> > }
> > @@ -3244,6 +3267,23 @@ kvfree_call_rcu_add_ptr_to_bulk(struct kfree_rcu_cpu *krcp, void *ptr)
> > return true;
> > }
> >
> > +static inline struct rcu_head *
> > +attach_rcu_head_to_object(void *obj)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long *ptr;
> > +
> > + ptr = kmalloc(sizeof(unsigned long *) +
> > + sizeof(struct rcu_head), GFP_NOWAIT |
> > + __GFP_RECLAIM | /* can do direct reclaim. */
> > + __GFP_NORETRY | /* only lightweight one. */
> > + __GFP_NOWARN); /* no failure reports. */
>
> Again, let's please not do this single-pointer-sized allocation. If
> a full page is not available and this is a single-argument kfree_rcu(),
> just call synchronize_rcu() and then free the object directly.
>
> It should not be -that- hard to adjust locking for CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT!
> For example, have some kind of reservation protocol so that a task
> that drops the lock can retry the page allocation and be sure of having
> a place to put it. This might entail making CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT reserve
> more pages per CPU. Or maybe that would not be necessary.
>
Agreed. Will drop it!

--
Vlad Rezki