From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Shile Zhang <shile.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Tzvetomir Stoyanov <tz.stoyanov@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] percpu: Sync vmalloc mappings in pcpu_alloc() and free_percpu()
Date: Mon, 4 May 2020 17:12:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200504151236.GI8135@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200430223919.50861011@gandalf.local.home>
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 10:39:19PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> What's so damn special about alloc_percpu()? It's definitely not a fast
> path. And it's not used often.
Okay, I fixed it in the percpu code. It is definitly not a nice
solution, but having to call vmalloc_sync_mappings/unmappings() is not a
nice solution at any place in the code. Here is the patch which fixes
this issue for me. I am also not sure what to put in the Fixes tag, as
it is related to tracing code accessing per-cpu data from the page-fault
handler, not sure when this got introduced. Maybe someone else can
provide a meaningful Fixes- or stable tag.
I also have an idea in mind how to make this all more robust and get rid
of the vmalloc_sync_mappings/unmappings() interface, will show more when
I know it works the way I think it does.
Regards,
Joerg
From c616a9a09499f9c9d682775767d3de7db81fb2ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2020 17:11:41 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] percpu: Sync vmalloc mappings in pcpu_alloc() and
free_percpu()
Sync the vmalloc mappings for all page-tables in the system when
allocating and freeing per-cpu memory. This is necessary for
architectures which use page-faults on vmalloc areas.
The page-fault handlers accesses per-cpu data when tracing is enabled,
and fauling again in the page-fault handler on a vmalloc'ed per-cpu area
will result in a recursive fault.
Signed-off-by: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
---
mm/percpu.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/percpu.c b/mm/percpu.c
index d7e3bc649f4e..6ab035bc6977 100644
--- a/mm/percpu.c
+++ b/mm/percpu.c
@@ -1710,6 +1710,20 @@ static void __percpu *pcpu_alloc(size_t size, size_t align, bool reserved,
trace_percpu_alloc_percpu(reserved, is_atomic, size, align,
chunk->base_addr, off, ptr);
+ /*
+ * The per-cpu buffers might be allocated in the vmalloc area of the
+ * address space. When the architecture allows faulting on the vmalloc
+ * area and the memory allocated here is accessed in the page-fault
+ * handler, the vmalloc area fault may be recursive and could never be
+ * resolved.
+ * This happens for example in the tracing code which allocates per-cpu
+ * and accesses them when tracing page-faults.
+ * To prevent this, make sure the per-cpu buffers allocated here are
+ * mapped in all PGDs so that the page-fault handler will never fault
+ * again on them.
+ */
+ vmalloc_sync_mappings();
+
return ptr;
fail_unlock:
@@ -1958,6 +1972,12 @@ void free_percpu(void __percpu *ptr)
trace_percpu_free_percpu(chunk->base_addr, off, ptr);
+ /*
+ * See comment at the vmalloc_sync_mappings() call in pcpu_alloc() for
+ * why this is necessary.
+ */
+ vmalloc_sync_unmappings();
+
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pcpu_lock, flags);
if (need_balance)
--
2.12.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-04 15:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-29 9:48 [RFC][PATCH] x86/mm: Sync all vmalloc mappings before text_poke() Steven Rostedt
2020-04-29 10:59 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-04-29 12:28 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-04-29 14:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-04-29 14:10 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-04-29 14:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-04-29 15:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-29 16:17 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-04-29 16:20 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-04-29 16:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-04-29 17:29 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-04-29 18:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-30 14:11 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-04-30 14:50 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-04-30 15:20 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-04-30 16:16 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-04-30 16:18 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-04-30 16:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-04-30 16:35 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-04-30 15:23 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-04-30 16:12 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-04-30 16:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-04-30 16:16 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-04-30 16:25 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-04-30 19:14 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-05-01 1:13 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-05-01 2:26 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-05-01 2:39 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-05-01 10:16 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-05-01 13:35 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-05-04 15:12 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2020-05-04 15:28 ` [PATCH] percpu: Sync vmalloc mappings in pcpu_alloc() and free_percpu() Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-05-04 15:31 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-05-04 15:38 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-05-04 15:51 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-05-04 17:04 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-05-04 17:40 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-05-04 18:38 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-05-04 19:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-05-05 12:31 ` [PATCH] tracing: Call vmalloc_sync_mappings() after alloc_percpu() Joerg Roedel
2020-05-06 15:17 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-05-08 14:42 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-05-04 20:25 ` [PATCH] percpu: Sync vmalloc mappings in pcpu_alloc() and free_percpu() Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-04 20:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-05-01 4:20 ` [RFC][PATCH] x86/mm: Sync all vmalloc mappings before text_poke() Steven Rostedt
2020-05-01 13:22 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200504151236.GI8135@suse.de \
--to=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=shile.zhang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tz.stoyanov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox