From: Joerg Roedel <jroedel@suse.de>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Shile Zhang <shile.zhang@linux.alibaba.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Tzvetomir Stoyanov <tz.stoyanov@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] percpu: Sync vmalloc mappings in pcpu_alloc() and free_percpu()
Date: Mon, 4 May 2020 20:38:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200504183832.GL8135@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200504134042.178409c3@gandalf.local.home>
On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 01:40:42PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> Seems that your patch caused a lockdep splat on my box:
>
> ========================================================
> WARNING: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected
> 5.7.0-rc3-test+ #249 Not tainted
> --------------------------------------------------------
> swapper/4/0 just changed the state of lock:
> ffff9a580fdd75a0 (&ndev->lock){++.-}-{2:2}, at: mld_ifc_timer_expire+0x3c/0x350
> but this lock took another, SOFTIRQ-unsafe lock in the past:
> (pgd_lock){+.+.}-{2:2}
>
>
> and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them.
>
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
> Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario:
>
> CPU0 CPU1
> ---- ----
> lock(pgd_lock);
> local_irq_disable();
> lock(&ndev->lock);
> lock(pgd_lock);
> <Interrupt>
> lock(&ndev->lock);
>
> *** DEADLOCK ***
Fair point, but this just shows how problematic it is to call something
like vmalloc_sync_mappings() from a lower-level kernel API function.
The obvious fix for this would be to make pgd_lock irq-safe, but this is
getting more and more ridiculous.
I know you don't like to have a vmalloc_sync_mappings() call in the
tracing code, but can you live with it until we get rid of this broken
interface?
My plan for this is to use a small bitmap to track in the vmalloc and
the (x86-)ioremap code at which levels of the page-tables the code made
changes and combine that with an architecture-dependend mask to decide
whether anything needs to be synced.
On x86-64 the sync would be necessary at most 64 times after boot, so I
think this will only have a very small performance impact, even with
VMAP_STACKS. And as a bonus it would also get rid of vmalloc faulting on
x86, fixing the issue with tracing too.
Regards,
Joerg
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-04 18:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-29 9:48 [RFC][PATCH] x86/mm: Sync all vmalloc mappings before text_poke() Steven Rostedt
2020-04-29 10:59 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-04-29 12:28 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-04-29 14:07 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-04-29 14:10 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-04-29 14:32 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-04-29 15:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-29 16:17 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-04-29 16:20 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-04-29 16:52 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-04-29 17:29 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-04-29 18:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-04-30 14:11 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-04-30 14:50 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-04-30 15:20 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-04-30 16:16 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-04-30 16:18 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-04-30 16:30 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-04-30 16:35 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-04-30 15:23 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-04-30 16:12 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-04-30 16:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-04-30 16:16 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-04-30 16:25 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-04-30 19:14 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-05-01 1:13 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-05-01 2:26 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-05-01 2:39 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-05-01 10:16 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-05-01 13:35 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-05-04 15:12 ` [PATCH] percpu: Sync vmalloc mappings in pcpu_alloc() and free_percpu() Joerg Roedel
2020-05-04 15:28 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-05-04 15:31 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-05-04 15:38 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2020-05-04 15:51 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-05-04 17:04 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-05-04 17:40 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-05-04 18:38 ` Joerg Roedel [this message]
2020-05-04 19:10 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-05-05 12:31 ` [PATCH] tracing: Call vmalloc_sync_mappings() after alloc_percpu() Joerg Roedel
2020-05-06 15:17 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-05-08 14:42 ` Joerg Roedel
2020-05-04 20:25 ` [PATCH] percpu: Sync vmalloc mappings in pcpu_alloc() and free_percpu() Peter Zijlstra
2020-05-04 20:43 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-05-01 4:20 ` [RFC][PATCH] x86/mm: Sync all vmalloc mappings before text_poke() Steven Rostedt
2020-05-01 13:22 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200504183832.GL8135@suse.de \
--to=jroedel@suse.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=shile.zhang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tz.stoyanov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox