From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
mingo@redhat.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com,
kan.liang@intel.com, yao.jin@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf evsel: Get group fd from CPU0 for system wide event
Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 02:03:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200505000352.GH1916255@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b799b66a-42aa-6c55-647e-7b718473632a@linux.intel.com>
On Sat, May 02, 2020 at 10:33:59AM +0800, Jin, Yao wrote:
SNIP
> > > @@ -1461,6 +1461,9 @@ static int get_group_fd(struct evsel *evsel, int cpu, int thread)
> > > BUG_ON(!leader->core.fd);
> > > fd = FD(leader, cpu, thread);
> > > + if (fd == -1 && leader->core.system_wide)
> >
> > fd does not need to be -1 in here.. in my setup cstate_pkg/c2-residency/
> > has cpumask 0, so other cpus never get open and are 0, and the whole thing
> > ends up with:
> >
> > sys_perf_event_open: pid -1 cpu 1 group_fd 0 flags 0
> > sys_perf_event_open failed, error -9
> >
> > I actualy thought we put -1 to fd array but couldn't find it.. perhaps we should od that
> >
> >
>
> I have tested on two platforms. On KBL desktop fd is 0 for this case, but on
> oncascadelakex server, fd is -1, so the BUG_ON(fd == -1) is triggered.
>
> > > + fd = FD(leader, 0, thread);
> > > +
> >
> > so how do we group following events?
> >
> > cstate_pkg/c2-residency/ - cpumask 0
> > msr/tsc/ - all cpus
> >
>
> Not sure if it's enough to only use cpumask 0 because
> cstate_pkg/c2-residency/ should be per-socket.
>
> > cpu 0 is fine.. the rest I have no idea ;-)
> >
>
> Perhaps we directly remove the BUG_ON(fd == -1) assertion?
I think we need to make clear how to deal with grouping over
events that comes for different cpus
so how do we group following events?
cstate_pkg/c2-residency/ - cpumask 0
msr/tsc/ - all cpus
what's the reason/expected output of groups with above events?
seems to make sense only if we limit msr/tsc/ to cpumask 0 as well
jirka
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-05 0:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-30 1:34 [PATCH] perf evsel: Get group fd from CPU0 for system wide event Jin Yao
2020-05-01 10:23 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-05-02 2:33 ` Jin, Yao
2020-05-05 0:03 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2020-05-09 7:37 ` Jin, Yao
2020-05-15 6:04 ` Jin, Yao
2020-05-15 8:33 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-05-18 3:28 ` Jin, Yao
2020-05-20 5:36 ` Jin, Yao
2020-05-20 7:50 ` Jiri Olsa
2020-05-21 4:38 ` Jin, Yao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200505000352.GH1916255@krava \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=yao.jin@intel.com \
--cc=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox