From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org,
Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Tobias Urdin <tobias.urdin@binero.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 STABLE 2/2] KVM: VMX: Mark RCX, RDX and RSI as clobbered in vmx_vcpu_run()'s asm blob
Date: Tue, 5 May 2020 07:37:37 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200505143737.GA18282@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200505070259.GA3946129@kroah.com>
On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 09:02:59AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 11:27:31PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 08:15:02AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Mon, May 04, 2020 at 06:23:48PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > > > Save RCX, RDX and RSI to fake outputs to coerce the compiler into
> > > > treating them as clobbered. RCX in particular is likely to be reused by
> > > > the compiler to dereference the 'struct vcpu_vmx' pointer, which will
> > > > result in a null pointer dereference now that RCX is zeroed by the asm
> > > > blob.
> > > >
> > > > Add ASM_CALL_CONSTRAINT to fudge around an issue where <something>
> > > > during modpost can't find vmx_return when specifying output constraints.
> > > >
> > > > Reported-by: Tobias Urdin <tobias.urdin@binero.com>
> > > > Fixes: b4be98039a92 ("KVM: VMX: Zero out *all* general purpose registers after VM-Exit")
> > > > Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 3 ++-
> > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> > > > index 5b06a98ffd4c..54c8b4dc750d 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> > > > +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> > > > @@ -10882,7 +10882,8 @@ static void __noclone vmx_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> > > > ".global vmx_return \n\t"
> > > > "vmx_return: " _ASM_PTR " 2b \n\t"
> > > > ".popsection"
> > > > - : : "c"(vmx), "d"((unsigned long)HOST_RSP), "S"(evmcs_rsp),
> > > > + : ASM_CALL_CONSTRAINT, "=c"((int){0}), "=d"((int){0}), "=S"((int){0})
> > > > + : "c"(vmx), "d"((unsigned long)HOST_RSP), "S"(evmcs_rsp),
> > > > [launched]"i"(offsetof(struct vcpu_vmx, __launched)),
> > > > [fail]"i"(offsetof(struct vcpu_vmx, fail)),
> > > > [host_rsp]"i"(offsetof(struct vcpu_vmx, host_rsp)),
> > > > --
> > > > 2.26.0
> > > >
> > >
> > > What is the git commit id of this patch in Linus's tree?
> >
> > There is none. In upstream at the time of the offending commit (b4be98039a92
> > in 4.19, 0e0ab73c9a024 upstream), the inline asm blob had previously been
> > moved to a dedicated helper, __vmx_vcpu_run(), that was intentionally put
> > into a separate compilation unit, i.e. consuming the clobbered register
> > was effectively impossible because %rcx is volatile and __vmx_vcpu_run()
> > couldn't itself be inlined.
> >
> > To make things more confusing, the inline asm blob got moved into a proper
> > asm subroutine shortly thereafter. Things really start to diverge from
> > current upstream right around the time of this commit.
>
> Then you need to document the heck out of the fact that this is not
> upstream, why it is different from upstream, and why we can't just take
> what upstream did instead in the changelog. That way, when this patch
> turns out to be buggy (hint, 90% of the times they are), we know why
> this was done the way it was so we can revert it and know who to
> complain to :)
Will do.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-05 14:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-05 1:23 [PATCH 4.19 STABLE 0/2] KVM: VMX: Fix null pointer dereference Sean Christopherson
2020-05-05 1:23 ` [PATCH 4.19 STABLE 1/2] KVM: VMX: Explicitly reference RCX as the vmx_vcpu pointer in asm blobs Sean Christopherson
2020-05-05 1:23 ` [PATCH 4.19 STABLE 2/2] KVM: VMX: Mark RCX, RDX and RSI as clobbered in vmx_vcpu_run()'s asm blob Sean Christopherson
2020-05-05 6:15 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-05-05 6:27 ` Sean Christopherson
2020-05-05 7:02 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-05-05 14:37 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200505143737.GA18282@linux.intel.com \
--to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=ben.hutchings@codethink.co.uk \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tobias.urdin@binero.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox