From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7F89C28CBC for ; Wed, 6 May 2020 06:31:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEC6F206E6 for ; Wed, 6 May 2020 06:31:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727892AbgEFGbj (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 May 2020 02:31:39 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:39193 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725882AbgEFGbi (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 May 2020 02:31:38 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 22E0A68C4E; Wed, 6 May 2020 08:31:35 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 08:31:34 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: "Eric W. Biederman" Cc: Linus Torvalds , Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , Alexander Viro , Jeremy Kerr , Arnd Bergmann , Oleg Nesterov , the arch/x86 maintainers , linuxppc-dev , linux-fsdevel , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: remove set_fs calls from the coredump code v6 Message-ID: <20200506063134.GA11391@lst.de> References: <20200505101256.3121270-1-hch@lst.de> <877dxqgm7x.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <877dxqgm7x.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 05, 2020 at 03:28:50PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote: > We probably can. After introducing a kernel_compat_siginfo that is > the size that userspace actually would need. > > It isn't something I want to mess with until this code gets merged, as I > think the set_fs cleanups are more important. > > > Christoph made some good points about how ugly the #ifdefs are in > the generic copy_siginfo_to_user32 implementation. Take a look at the series you are replying to, the magic x86 ifdefs are entirely gone from the common code :)