public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
To: "Daniel W. S. Almeida" <dwlsalmeida@gmail.com>
Cc: "sean@mess.org" <sean@mess.org>,
	"kstewart@linuxfoundation.org" <kstewart@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"allison@lohutok.net" <allison@lohutok.net>,
	"tglx@linutronix.de" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"linux-media@vger.kernel.org" <linux-media@vger.kernel.org>,
	"skhan@linuxfoundation.org" <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org" 
	<linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC, WIP, v4 08/11] media: vidtv: implement a PSI generator
Date: Wed, 6 May 2020 10:36:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200506103643.699fe077@coco.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <81B965F9-3A09-40D0-87DF-611A153E744C@getmailspring.com>

Em Wed, 6 May 2020 03:28:17 -0300
"Daniel W. S. Almeida" <dwlsalmeida@gmail.com> escreveu:

> >> +	/* Just a sanity check, should not really happen because we stuff
> >> +	 * the packet when we finish a section, i.e. when we write the crc at
> >> +	 * the end. But if this happens then we have messed up the logic
> >> +	 * somewhere.
> >> +	 */
> >> +	WARN_ON(args.new_psi_section && !aligned);  
> >  
> > Please use a ratelimited printk instead (here and on all similar cases
> > at the TS generator).
> >  
> > Also, I think that, on such case, the driver should be filling the
> > remaining frame with pad bytes. E. g.:
> >  
> > 	/*  
> > 	 * Assuming that vidtv_memset() args from patch 06/11 were changed  
> > 	 * according with this prototype:  
> > 	 */
> > 	size_t vidtv_memset(void *to, size_t to_offset, size_t to_size,
> > 			    u8 c, size_t len);
> >  
> >  
> > 	#define TS_FILL_BYTE 0xff
> >  
> > 	if (args.new_psi_section && !aligned) {
> > 		pr_warn_ratelimit("Warning: PSI not aligned. Re-aligning it\n");
> >  
> > 		vidtv_memset(args.dest_buf,
> > 			     args.dest_offset + nbytes_past_boundary,
> > 			     args.dest_buf_sz,
> > 			     TS_FILL_BYTE,		
> > 			     TS_PACKET_LEN - nbytes_past_boundary);
> > 		args.dest_offset += TS_PACKET_LEN - nbytes_past_boundary;
> > 		aligned = 1;
> > 		nbytes_past_boundary = 0;
> > 	}
> >    
> 
> Sure, that's fine then! Just to be clear this should not happen at all,
> because the writes should go through one of these four functions (IIRC!):
> 
> u32 vidtv_ts_null_write_into(struct null_packet_write_args args)
> u32 vidtv_ts_pcr_write_into(struct pcr_write_args args)
> 
> ...which will write a single packet at a time, thus leaving the buffer
> aligned if it was already aligned to begin with,
> 
> and
> 
> u32 vidtv_pes_write_into(struct pes_write_args args)
> static u32
> vidtv_psi_ts_psi_write_into(struct psi_write_args args)
> 
> ...which will pad when they finish writing a PES packet or a table
> section, respectively.
> 
> I left these warnings behind as a way to warn me if the padding logic
> itself is broken.

OK!

> > Please use a ratelimited printk instead (here and on all similar cases
> > at the TS generator).  
> 
> OK.
> 
> 
> 
> >> +static void vidtv_psi_desc_to_be(struct vidtv_psi_desc *desc)
> >> +{
> >> +	/*
> >> +	 * Convert descriptor endianness to big-endian on a field-by-field
> >> basis
> >> +	 * where applicable
> >> +	 */
> >> +
> >> +	switch (desc->type) {
> >> +	/* nothing do do */
> >> +	case SERVICE_DESCRIPTOR:
> >> +		break;
> >> +	case REGISTRATION_DESCRIPTOR:
> >> +		cpu_to_be32s(&((struct vidtv_psi_desc_registration *)
> >> +			     desc)->format_identifier);
> >> +		pr_alert("%s: descriptor type %d found\n",
> >> +			 __func__,
> >> +			 desc->type);
> >> +		pr_alert("%s: change 'additional_info' endianness before
> >> calling\n",
> >> +			 __func__);  
> >  
> > The above pr_alert() calls sound weird. Why are you unconditionally
> > calling it (and still doing the BE conversion) for all
> > REGISTRATION_DESCRIPTOR types?  
> 
> To be honest, I did not know what to do. Here's what 13818-1 has to say
> about registration descriptors:
> 
> >2.6.9
> > Semantic definition of fields in registration descriptor
> >format_identifier – The format_identifier is a 32-bit value obtained
> >from a Registration Authority as designated by
> >ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29.
> >additional_identification_info – The meaning of
> >additional_identification_info bytes, if any, are defined by the
> >assignee of that format_identifier, and once defined they shall not change.  
> 
> So I took the cue from libdvbv5 and defined the following struct for it,
> with a flexible array member at the end:

André (who re-wrote the libdvbv5 parsers to be more generic)
preferred the approach of keeping the structs in CPU-endian, as it
makes easier from application PoV, as the conversion happens only once
at the library.

That's not the case here. We can fill the structs in big endian,
converting to CPU-endian only on the few places we may need to read
back from it.

> 
> struct vidtv_psi_desc_registration {
> 	u8 type;
> 	u8 length;
> 	struct vidtv_psi_desc *next;
> 
> 	/*
> 	 * The format_identifier is a 32-bit value obtained from a Registration
> 	 * Authority as designated by ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 29.
> 	 */
> 	u32 format_identifier;
> 	/*
> 	 * The meaning of additional_identification_info bytes, if any, are
> 	 * defined by the assignee of that format_identifier, and once defined
> 	 * they shall not change.
> 	 */
> 	u8 additional_identification_info[];
> } __packed
> 
> 
> As you know, I was changing the endianness from host to BE before
> serializing and then changing back from BE to host. Given the struct
> definition above, there was no way to do this to the
> 'additional_identification_info' member, since we do not know its layout.
> 
> If we go with your approach instead (i.e. using __be16, __be32...etc)
> then I think we can remove these two functions (and more)

Yep. 

Thanks,
Mauro

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-06  8:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-02  3:22 [RFC, WIP, v4 00/11] media: vidtv: implement a virtual DVB driver Daniel W. S. Almeida
2020-05-02  3:22 ` [RFC, WIP, v4 01/11] media: vidtv: add Kconfig entry Daniel W. S. Almeida
2020-05-02  4:58   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-05-02  3:22 ` [RFC, WIP, v4 02/11] media: vidtv: implement a tuner driver Daniel W. S. Almeida
2020-05-02  5:27   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-05-02  3:22 ` [RFC, WIP, v4 03/11] media: vidtv: implement a demodulator driver Daniel W. S. Almeida
2020-05-02  5:58   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-05-02  3:22 ` [RFC, WIP, v4 04/11] media: vidtv: move config structs into a separate header Daniel W. S. Almeida
2020-05-02  6:02   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-05-02  3:22 ` [RFC, WIP, v4 05/11] media: vidtv: add a bridge driver Daniel W. S. Almeida
2020-05-02  6:30   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-05-02 21:12     ` Daniel W. S. Almeida
2020-05-02  3:22 ` [RFC, WIP, v4 06/11] media: vidtv: add wrappers for memcpy and memset Daniel W. S. Almeida
2020-05-02  6:40   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-05-03  7:06     ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-05-02  3:22 ` [RFC, WIP, v4 07/11] media: vidtv: add MPEG TS common code Daniel W. S. Almeida
2020-05-02  7:09   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-05-02 22:22     ` Daniel W. S. Almeida
2020-05-03  9:50       ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-05-02  3:22 ` [RFC, WIP, v4 08/11] media: vidtv: implement a PSI generator Daniel W. S. Almeida
2020-05-03  7:51   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-05-06  6:28     ` Daniel W. S. Almeida
2020-05-06  8:36       ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab [this message]
2020-05-02  3:22 ` [RFC, WIP, v4 09/11] media: vidtv: implement a PES packetizer Daniel W. S. Almeida
2020-05-03  8:16   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-05-06  6:55     ` Daniel W. S. Almeida
2020-05-06  8:59       ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-05-02  3:22 ` [RFC, WIP, v4 10/11] media: vidtv: Implement a SMPTE 302M encoder Daniel W. S. Almeida
2020-05-03  8:57   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-05-02  3:22 ` [RFC, WIP, v4 11/11] media: vidtv: Add a MPEG Transport Stream Multiplexer Daniel W. S. Almeida
2020-05-03  9:13   ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-05-06  7:05     ` Daniel W. S. Almeida
2020-05-06  9:01       ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200506103643.699fe077@coco.lan \
    --to=mchehab+huawei@kernel.org \
    --cc=allison@lohutok.net \
    --cc=dwlsalmeida@gmail.com \
    --cc=kstewart@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-media@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sean@mess.org \
    --cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox