public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: acme@kernel.org, jolsa@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	mingo@redhat.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
	Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com,
	kan.liang@intel.com, yao.jin@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] perf counts: Reset prev_raw_counts counts
Date: Thu, 7 May 2020 17:19:32 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200507151932.GF2804092@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200507065822.8255-3-yao.jin@linux.intel.com>

On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 02:58:20PM +0800, Jin Yao wrote:
> The evsel->prev_raw_counts is updated in perf_evsel__compute_deltas:
> 
> perf_evsel__compute_deltas()
> {
> 	tmp = *perf_counts(evsel->prev_raw_counts, cpu, thread);
> 	*perf_counts(evsel->prev_raw_counts, cpu, thread) = *count;
> }
> 
> When we want to reset the evsel->prev_raw_counts in
> perf_evsel__reset_prev_raw_counts, zeroing the aggr is not enough,
> we need to reset the counts too.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jin Yao <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/util/counts.c | 5 +++++
>  tools/perf/util/counts.h | 2 ++
>  tools/perf/util/stat.c   | 1 +
>  3 files changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/counts.c b/tools/perf/util/counts.c
> index f94e1a23dad6..af3bf36f7c63 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/counts.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/counts.c
> @@ -64,3 +64,8 @@ void perf_evsel__free_counts(struct evsel *evsel)
>  	perf_counts__delete(evsel->counts);
>  	evsel->counts = NULL;
>  }
> +
> +void perf_evsel__reset_raw_counts(struct evsel *evsel)
> +{
> +	perf_counts__reset(evsel->prev_raw_counts);
> +}
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/counts.h b/tools/perf/util/counts.h
> index 92196df4945f..15bb9acb7cb0 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/counts.h
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/counts.h
> @@ -42,4 +42,6 @@ void perf_evsel__reset_counts(struct evsel *evsel);
>  int perf_evsel__alloc_counts(struct evsel *evsel, int ncpus, int nthreads);
>  void perf_evsel__free_counts(struct evsel *evsel);
>  
> +void perf_evsel__reset_raw_counts(struct evsel *evsel);
> +
>  #endif /* __PERF_COUNTS_H */
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/stat.c b/tools/perf/util/stat.c
> index 774468341851..89e541564ed5 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/stat.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/stat.c
> @@ -168,6 +168,7 @@ static void perf_evsel__reset_prev_raw_counts(struct evsel *evsel)
>  		evsel->prev_raw_counts->aggr.val = 0;
>  		evsel->prev_raw_counts->aggr.ena = 0;
>  		evsel->prev_raw_counts->aggr.run = 0;
> +		perf_evsel__reset_raw_counts(evsel);

that seems needed, but we have it scathered all over the place,
could you centralize the reset? the way I see it the perf_counts__reset
should zero all the members of struct perf_counts.. so also
the aggr values

it could also check for counts != NULL and we could call it
instead of:
  perf_evsel__reset_prev_raw_counts
    perf_evsel__reset_raw_counts
      perf_counts__reset

jirka


  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-07 15:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-07  6:58 [PATCH v3 0/4] perf stat: Support overall statistics for interval mode Jin Yao
2020-05-07  6:58 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] perf stat: Fix wrong per-thread runtime stat " Jin Yao
2020-05-07 15:19   ` Jiri Olsa
2020-05-08  2:03     ` Jin, Yao
2020-05-07  6:58 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] perf counts: Reset prev_raw_counts counts Jin Yao
2020-05-07 15:19   ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2020-05-08  2:45     ` Jin, Yao
2020-05-07  6:58 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] perf stat: Copy counts from prev_raw_counts to evsel->counts Jin Yao
2020-05-07 15:19   ` Jiri Olsa
2020-05-08  3:34     ` Jin, Yao
2020-05-07  6:58 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] perf stat: Report summary for interval mode Jin Yao
2020-05-07 15:18   ` Jiri Olsa
2020-05-08  1:11     ` Jin, Yao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200507151932.GF2804092@krava \
    --to=jolsa@redhat.com \
    --cc=Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=yao.jin@intel.com \
    --cc=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox