From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1161DC38A2A for ; Mon, 11 May 2020 00:56:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6A3F24954 for ; Mon, 11 May 2020 00:56:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729459AbgEKA4Z (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 May 2020 20:56:25 -0400 Received: from mga05.intel.com ([192.55.52.43]:1592 "EHLO mga05.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729302AbgEKA4Y (ORCPT ); Sun, 10 May 2020 20:56:24 -0400 IronPort-SDR: 7LE367MqfeTm+caxdGA9YEyEcoE2hYt0G1ThVtAIRKAZ22GYsroJcgt/odGkM9MId8znyBk4HY TMwVMhj2AIXA== X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 May 2020 17:56:24 -0700 IronPort-SDR: p9cG2sLzEnGofGBrJBozvTdYgWEAdpRBOaLISQutzOhWg+nqHMAznzgjluOzE0KtYSRJMgJ/Lc L0wPiuvMAcWQ== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.73,377,1583222400"; d="scan'208";a="261589737" Received: from tassilo.jf.intel.com (HELO tassilo.localdomain) ([10.7.201.21]) by orsmga003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 May 2020 17:56:24 -0700 Received: by tassilo.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 12662301C52; Sun, 10 May 2020 17:56:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 10 May 2020 17:56:24 -0700 From: Andi Kleen To: Joakim Zhang Cc: kajoljain , "acme@kernel.org" , Jiri Olsa , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org" , Kan Liang , Madhavan Srinivasan , Anju T Sudhakar , Ravi Bangoria , yao.jin@intel.com Subject: Re: [RFC] Issue in final aggregate value, in case of multiple events present in metric expression Message-ID: <20200511005624.GL3538@tassilo.jf.intel.com> References: <20200212054102.9259-1-kjain@linux.ibm.com> <6f98d281-f3de-b547-70d4-8fc95515b12f@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, May 09, 2020 at 05:52:53AM +0000, Joakim Zhang wrote: > > Hi Arnaldo, > > Kajol reflects this issue for almost two months, got no feedbacks, do you have any comments? That could be appreciated if you can look into it. Thanks a lot! Jin Yao did a lot of fixes to metrics recently. Does it still happen with the latest tip tree? -Andi