Re: [PATCH v3] perf c2c: fix '-e list'

[Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>]

On Thu, May 07, 2020 at 03:06:04PM -0700, Ian Rogers wrote:
> When the event is passed as list, the default events should be listed as
> per 'perf mem record -e list'. Previous behavior is:
> 
> $ perf c2c record -e list
> failed: event 'list' not found, use '-e list' to get list of available events
> 
>  Usage: perf c2c record [<options>] [<command>]
>     or: perf c2c record [<options>] -- <command> [<options>]
> 
>     -e, --event <event>   event selector. Use 'perf mem record -e list' to list available events
> 
> New behavior:
> 
> $ perf c2c record -e list
> ldlat-loads  : available
> ldlat-stores : available
> 
> v3: is a rebase.
> v2: addresses review comments by Jiri Olsa.
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20191127081844.GH32367@krava/
> Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
> ---
>  tools/perf/Documentation/perf-c2c.txt |  2 +-
>  tools/perf/builtin-c2c.c              |  9 ++++++++-
>  tools/perf/builtin-mem.c              | 24 +++++++-----------------
>  tools/perf/util/mem-events.c          | 15 +++++++++++++++
>  tools/perf/util/mem-events.h          |  2 ++
>  5 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-c2c.txt b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-c2c.txt
> index 2133eb320cb0..98efdab5fbd4 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-c2c.txt
> +++ b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-c2c.txt
> @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ RECORD OPTIONS
>  --------------
>  -e::
>  --event=::
> -	Select the PMU event. Use 'perf mem record -e list'
> +	Select the PMU event. Use 'perf c2c record -e list'
>  	to list available events.
>  
>  -v::
> diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-c2c.c b/tools/perf/builtin-c2c.c
> index 1baf4cae086f..d617d5682c68 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/builtin-c2c.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/builtin-c2c.c
> @@ -2887,8 +2887,15 @@ static int parse_record_events(const struct option *opt,
>  {
>  	bool *event_set = (bool *) opt->value;
>  
> +	if (!strcmp(str, "list")) {
> +		perf_mem_events__list();
> +		exit(0);
> +	}
> +	if (perf_mem_events__parse(str))
> +		exit(-1);

won't this exit(-1) callsbreak the parsing stuff?
like displaying the option values on error or such?

other than that it looks ok to me

jirka