From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E42F2C2D0F8 for ; Tue, 12 May 2020 22:31:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA87220731 for ; Tue, 12 May 2020 22:31:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="SQw4qi4Q" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731279AbgELWbO (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 May 2020 18:31:14 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-2.mimecast.com ([205.139.110.61]:21733 "EHLO us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728220AbgELWbN (ORCPT ); Tue, 12 May 2020 18:31:13 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1589322672; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=YD4eV5Zg/zcvyFEl47MW+GCWx9tAYaUwV9UBJhWyuxU=; b=SQw4qi4QPfzCYHw5aKVFwZKT6HxL7CTyL/RWEmtHD9DNBqt2Rbb5KCaL1F1f3a63OUsLw+ XT6ZEpXrl5jbBYE7dOa/8tmezEdUkr33fUUlN8pq/HQzBjE56b2jOFbnCRWb04Img6y/8r Kor3Y4LsqE/uIRc3lBbPsNPQ4PIMMr4= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-174-6JPl9u_LNFOfLYPirTHD0A-1; Tue, 12 May 2020 18:31:00 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 6JPl9u_LNFOfLYPirTHD0A-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5ABF4EC1A1; Tue, 12 May 2020 22:30:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from asgard.redhat.com (unknown [10.36.110.6]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C195410001B3; Tue, 12 May 2020 22:30:56 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 13 May 2020 00:31:03 +0200 From: Eugene Syromiatnikov To: Sergey Organov Cc: John Stultz , Thomas Gleixner , Stephen Boyd , Frederic Weisbecker , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , "Eric W. Biederman" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] uapi, posix-timers: provide clockid-related macros and functions to UAPI Message-ID: <20200512223103.GC1016@asgard.redhat.com> References: <20190923130531.GA27774@asgard.redhat.com> <87y2pxvsbr.fsf@osv.gnss.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87y2pxvsbr.fsf@osv.gnss.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.84 on 10.5.11.22 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 12, 2020 at 10:58:16PM +0300, Sergey Organov wrote: > Eugene Syromiatnikov writes: > > > As of now, there is no interface exposed for converting pid/fd into > > clockid and vice versa; linuxptp, for example, has been carrying these > > definitions in missing.h header for quite some time[1]. > > > > [1] https://sourceforge.net/p/linuxptp/code/ci/af380e86/tree/missing.h > > > > Signed-off-by: Eugene Syromiatnikov > > --- > > Changes since v1[1]: > > * Actually tried to build with the patch and fixed the build error > > reported by kbuild test robot[2]. > > > > [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/9/20/698 > > [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/9/22/13 > > --- > > include/linux/posix-timers.h | 47 +------------------------------------------ > > include/uapi/linux/time.h | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-) > > Was this patch applied, rejected, lost? > > I can't find it in the current master. IIRC, it was ignored.