linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, bp@alien8.de,
	luto@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, dave.hansen@intel.com,
	tony.luck@intel.com, ak@linux.intel.com,
	ravi.v.shankar@intel.com, chang.seok.bae@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 00/18] Enable FSGSBASE instructions
Date: Fri, 15 May 2020 12:40:13 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200515164013.GF29995@sasha-vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0186c22a8a6be1516df0703c421faaa581041774.camel@linux.intel.com>

On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 12:24:14PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>On Mon, 2020-05-11 at 00:52 -0400, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> Benefits:
>> Currently a user process that wishes to read or write the FS/GS base must
>> make a system call. But recent X86 processors have added new instructions
>> for use in 64-bit mode that allow direct access to the FS and GS segment
>> base addresses.  The operating system controls whether applications can
>> use these instructions with a %cr4 control bit.
>>
>> In addition to benefits to applications, performance improvements to the
>> OS context switch code are possible by making use of these instructions. A
>> third party reported out promising performance numbers out of their
>> initial benchmarking of the previous version of this patch series [9].
>>
>> Enablement check:
>> The kernel provides information about the enabled state of FSGSBASE to
>> applications using the ELF_AUX vector. If the HWCAP2_FSGSBASE bit is set in
>> the AUX vector, the kernel has FSGSBASE instructions enabled and
>> applications can use them.
>>
>> Kernel changes:
>> Major changes made in the kernel are in context switch, paranoid path, and
>> ptrace. In a context switch, a task's FS/GS base will be secured regardless
>> of its selector. In the paranoid path, GS base is unconditionally
>> overwritten to the kernel GS base on entry and the original GS base is
>> restored on exit. Ptrace includes divergence of FS/GS index and base
>> values.
>>
>> Security:
>> For mitigating the Spectre v1 SWAPGS issue, LFENCE instructions were added
>> on most kernel entries. Those patches are dependent on previous behaviors
>> that users couldn't load a kernel address into the GS base. These patches
>> change that assumption since the user can load any address into GS base.
>> The changes to the kernel entry path in this patch series take account of
>> the SWAPGS issue.
>>
>> Changes from v11:
>>
>>  - Rebase to v5.7-rc5, fix 32bit compilation error.
>>
>>
>> Andi Kleen (2):
>>   x86/fsgsbase/64: Add intrinsics for FSGSBASE instructions
>>   x86/elf: Enumerate kernel FSGSBASE capability in AT_HWCAP2
>>
>> Andy Lutomirski (4):
>>   x86/cpu: Add 'unsafe_fsgsbase' to enable CR4.FSGSBASE
>>   x86/entry/64: Clean up paranoid exit
>>   x86/fsgsbase/64: Use FSGSBASE in switch_to() if available
>>   x86/fsgsbase/64: Enable FSGSBASE on 64bit by default and add a chicken
>>     bit
>>
>> Chang S. Bae (9):
>>   x86/ptrace: Prevent ptrace from clearing the FS/GS selector
>>   selftests/x86/fsgsbase: Test GS selector on ptracer-induced GS base
>>     write
>>   x86/entry/64: Switch CR3 before SWAPGS in paranoid entry
>>   x86/entry/64: Introduce the FIND_PERCPU_BASE macro
>>   x86/entry/64: Handle FSGSBASE enabled paranoid entry/exit
>>   x86/entry/64: Document GSBASE handling in the paranoid path
>>   x86/fsgsbase/64: Enable FSGSBASE instructions in helper functions
>>   x86/fsgsbase/64: Use FSGSBASE instructions on thread copy and ptrace
>>   selftests/x86/fsgsbase: Test ptracer-induced GS base write with
>>     FSGSBASE
>>
>> Sasha Levin (1):
>>   x86/fsgsbase/64: move save_fsgs to header file
>>
>> Thomas Gleixner (1):
>>   Documentation/x86/64: Add documentation for GS/FS addressing mode
>>
>> Tony Luck (1):
>>   x86/speculation/swapgs: Check FSGSBASE in enabling SWAPGS mitigation
>>
>>  .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt         |   2 +
>>  Documentation/x86/entry_64.rst                |   9 +
>>  Documentation/x86/x86_64/fsgs.rst             | 199 ++++++++++++++++++
>>  Documentation/x86/x86_64/index.rst            |   1 +
>>  arch/x86/entry/calling.h                      |  40 ++++
>>  arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S                     | 131 +++++++++---
>>  arch/x86/include/asm/fsgsbase.h               |  45 +++-
>>  arch/x86/include/asm/inst.h                   |  15 ++
>>  arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/hwcap2.h            |   3 +
>>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c                    |   6 +-
>>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c                  |  22 ++
>>  arch/x86/kernel/process.c                     |   9 +-
>>  arch/x86/kernel/process.h                     |  72 +++++++
>>  arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c                  | 142 +++++++------
>>  arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c                      |  17 +-
>>  tools/testing/selftests/x86/fsgsbase.c        |  24 ++-
>>  16 files changed, 608 insertions(+), 129 deletions(-)
>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/x86/x86_64/fsgs.rst
>>
>
>Can you put me to the CC-loop for this patches. Some SGX-enabled

Sure!

>frameworks such as Graphene use out-of-tree changes to achieve this.
>That's where the interest to possibly test this comes from.

Indeed, we've seen a few hacks that basically just enable FSGSBASE:

 - https://github.com/oscarlab/graphene-sgx-driver
 - https://github.com/occlum/enable_rdfsbase

And would very much like to get rid of them...

-- 
Thanks,
Sasha

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-15 16:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-11  4:52 [PATCH v12 00/18] Enable FSGSBASE instructions Sasha Levin
2020-05-11  4:52 ` [PATCH v12 01/18] x86/ptrace: Prevent ptrace from clearing the FS/GS selector Sasha Levin
2020-05-11  4:52 ` [PATCH v12 02/18] selftests/x86/fsgsbase: Test GS selector on ptracer-induced GS base write Sasha Levin
2020-05-11  4:52 ` [PATCH v12 03/18] x86/cpu: Add 'unsafe_fsgsbase' to enable CR4.FSGSBASE Sasha Levin
2020-05-11  4:52 ` [PATCH v12 04/18] x86/entry/64: Clean up paranoid exit Sasha Levin
2020-05-11  4:52 ` [PATCH v12 05/18] x86/entry/64: Switch CR3 before SWAPGS in paranoid entry Sasha Levin
2020-05-11  4:52 ` [PATCH v12 06/18] x86/entry/64: Introduce the FIND_PERCPU_BASE macro Sasha Levin
2020-05-11  4:53 ` [PATCH v12 07/18] x86/entry/64: Handle FSGSBASE enabled paranoid entry/exit Sasha Levin
2020-05-11  4:53 ` [PATCH v12 08/18] x86/entry/64: Document GSBASE handling in the paranoid path Sasha Levin
2020-05-11  4:53 ` [PATCH v12 09/18] x86/fsgsbase/64: Add intrinsics for FSGSBASE instructions Sasha Levin
2020-05-11  4:53 ` [PATCH v12 10/18] x86/fsgsbase/64: Enable FSGSBASE instructions in helper functions Sasha Levin
2020-05-18 18:20   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-18 20:24     ` Sasha Levin
2020-05-18 22:59       ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-19 12:20       ` David Laight
2020-05-19 14:48         ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-20  9:13           ` David Laight
2020-05-11  4:53 ` [PATCH v12 11/18] x86/fsgsbase/64: Use FSGSBASE in switch_to() if available Sasha Levin
2020-05-11  4:53 ` [PATCH v12 12/18] x86/fsgsbase/64: move save_fsgs to header file Sasha Levin
2020-05-11  4:53 ` [PATCH v12 13/18] x86/fsgsbase/64: Use FSGSBASE instructions on thread copy and ptrace Sasha Levin
2020-05-11  4:53 ` [PATCH v12 14/18] x86/speculation/swapgs: Check FSGSBASE in enabling SWAPGS mitigation Sasha Levin
2020-05-11  4:53 ` [PATCH v12 15/18] selftests/x86/fsgsbase: Test ptracer-induced GS base write with FSGSBASE Sasha Levin
2020-05-11  4:53 ` [PATCH v12 16/18] x86/fsgsbase/64: Enable FSGSBASE on 64bit by default and add a chicken bit Sasha Levin
2020-05-11  4:53 ` [PATCH v12 17/18] x86/elf: Enumerate kernel FSGSBASE capability in AT_HWCAP2 Sasha Levin
2020-05-11  4:53 ` [PATCH v12 18/18] Documentation/x86/64: Add documentation for GS/FS addressing mode Sasha Levin
2020-05-15  9:24 ` [PATCH v12 00/18] Enable FSGSBASE instructions Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-05-15 16:40   ` Sasha Levin [this message]
2020-05-15 17:55     ` Andi Kleen
2020-05-15 23:07       ` Sasha Levin
2020-05-16 12:21       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-05-16  9:50     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-05-18 15:34       ` Andi Kleen
2020-05-18 20:01         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-05-18 23:03           ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-19 16:48             ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-05-22 20:14               ` Don Porter
2020-05-22 20:55                 ` Dave Hansen
2020-05-23  0:45                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-24 19:45                   ` hpa
2020-05-24 21:19                     ` Sasha Levin
2020-05-24 23:44                       ` hpa
2020-05-25  7:54                       ` Richard Weinberger
2020-05-25 21:56                         ` Tony Luck
2020-05-26  8:12                         ` David Laight
2020-05-26  8:23                           ` Richard Weinberger
2020-05-27  8:31                     ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-05-26 12:42                   ` Don Porter
2020-05-26 20:27                     ` Sasha Levin
2020-05-26 22:03                       ` Don Porter
2020-05-26 22:51                         ` Sasha Levin
2020-05-28 17:37                           ` Don Porter
2020-05-28 10:29                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-28 17:40                       ` Don Porter
2020-05-28 18:38                         ` Andy Lutomirski
2020-05-29 15:27                           ` Wojtek Porczyk
2020-06-25 15:27                             ` Don Porter
2020-06-25 21:37                               ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-07-18 18:19                                 ` Don Porter
2020-07-23  3:23                                   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-05-28 19:19                         ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-05-28 19:41                           ` Sasha Levin
2020-05-29  3:07                             ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-05-29  3:10                               ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-06-25 15:30                                 ` Don Porter
2020-06-25 21:40                                   ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-05-23  4:19                 ` Andi Kleen
2020-05-28 10:36                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-27  8:20                 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-05-27 12:42                   ` Wojtek Porczyk
2020-05-18  9:51     ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-18 15:16       ` Sasha Levin
2020-05-18 18:28         ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-05-18 19:36       ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2020-05-18  6:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-05-18 12:33   ` Sasha Levin
2020-05-18 14:53 ` Thomas Gleixner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200515164013.GF29995@sasha-vm \
    --to=sashal@kernel.org \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=chang.seok.bae@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jarkko.sakkinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).