From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com>,
kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, LKP <lkp@lists.01.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>
Subject: Re: [rcu] 2f08469563: BUG:kernel_reboot-without-warning_in_boot_stage
Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 20:05:13 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200518180513.GA114619@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKwvOd=Gi2z_NjRfpTigCCcV5kUWU7Bm7h1eHLeQ6DZCmrsR8w@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 18 May 2020, 'Nick Desaulniers' via kasan-dev wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 7:34 AM Marco Elver <elver@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 18 May 2020 at 14:44, Marco Elver <elver@google.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > [+Cc clang-built-linux FYI]
> > >
> > > On Mon, 18 May 2020 at 12:11, Marco Elver <elver@google.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Sun, 17 May 2020 at 05:47, Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Sun, May 17, 2020 at 09:17:32AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> > > > > > Greeting,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with clang-11):
> > > > > >
> > > > > > commit: 2f08469563550d15cb08a60898d3549720600eee ("rcu: Mark rcu_state.ncpus to detect concurrent writes")
> > > > > > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git dev.2020.05.14c
> > > > > >
> > > > > > in testcase: boot
> > > > > >
> > > > > > on test machine: qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -cpu SandyBridge -smp 2 -m 8G
> > > > > >
> > > > > > caused below changes (please refer to attached dmesg/kmsg for entire log/backtrace):
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag
> > > > > > Reported-by: kernel test robot <rong.a.chen@intel.com>
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > [ 0.054943] BRK [0x05204000, 0x05204fff] PGTABLE
> > > > > > [ 0.061181] BRK [0x05205000, 0x05205fff] PGTABLE
> > > > > > [ 0.062403] BRK [0x05206000, 0x05206fff] PGTABLE
> > > > > > [ 0.065200] RAMDISK: [mem 0x7a247000-0x7fffffff]
> > > > > > [ 0.067344] ACPI: Early table checksum verification disabled
> > > > > > BUG: kernel reboot-without-warning in boot stage
> > > > >
> > > > > I am having some difficulty believing that this commit is at fault given
> > > > > that the .config does not list CONFIG_KCSAN=y, but CCing Marco Elver
> > > > > for his thoughts. Especially given that I have never built with clang-11.
> > > > >
> > > > > But this does invoke ASSERT_EXCLUSIVE_WRITER() in early boot from
> > > > > rcu_init(). Might clang-11 have objections to early use of this macro?
> > > >
> > > > The macro is a noop without KCSAN. I think the bisection went wrong.
> > > >
> > > > I am able to reproduce a reboot-without-warning when building with
> > > > Clang 11 and the provided config. I did a bisect, starting with v5.6
> > > > (good), and found this:
> > > > - Since v5.6, first bad commit is
> > > > 20e2aa812620439d010a3f78ba4e05bc0b3e2861 (Merge tag
> > > > 'perf-urgent-2020-04-12' of
> > > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel//git/tip/tip)
> > > > - The actual commit that introduced the problem is
> > > > 2b3b76b5ec67568da4bb475d3ce8a92ef494b5de (perf/x86/intel/uncore: Add
> > > > Ice Lake server uncore support) -- reverting it fixes the problem.
> >
> > Some more clues:
> >
> > 1. I should have noticed that this uses CONFIG_KASAN=y.
>
> Thanks for the report, testing, and bisection. I don't see any
> smoking gun in the code.
> https://godbolt.org/z/qbK26r
My guess is data layout and maybe some interaction with KASAN. I also
played around with leaving icx_mmio_uncores empty, meaning none of the
data it refers to end up in the data section (presumably because
optimized out), which resulted in making the bug disappear as well.
> >
> > 2. Something about function icx_uncore_mmio_init(). Making it a noop
> > also makes the issue go away.
> >
> > 3. Leaving icx_uncore_mmio_init() a noop but removing the 'static'
> > from icx_mmio_uncores also presents the issue. So this seems to be
> > something about how/where icx_mmio_uncores is allocated.
>
> Can you share the disassembly of icx_uncore_mmio_init() in the given
> configuration?
ffffffff8102c097 <icx_uncore_mmio_init>:
ffffffff8102c097: e8 b4 52 bd 01 callq ffffffff82c01350 <__fentry__>
ffffffff8102c09c: 48 c7 c7 e0 55 c3 83 mov $0xffffffff83c355e0,%rdi
ffffffff8102c0a3: e8 69 9a 3b 00 callq ffffffff813e5b11 <__asan_store8>
ffffffff8102c0a8: 48 c7 05 2d 95 c0 02 movq $0xffffffff83c388e0,0x2c0952d(%rip) # ffffffff83c355e0 <uncore_mmio_uncores>
ffffffff8102c0af: e0 88 c3 83
ffffffff8102c0b3: c3 retq
The problem still happens if we add a __no_sanitize_address (or even
KASAN_SANITIZE := n) here. I think this function is a red herring: you
can make this function be empty, but as long as icx_mmio_uncores and its
dependencies are added to the data section somewhere, does the bug
appear.
Thanks,
-- Marco
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-18 18:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-17 1:17 [rcu] 2f08469563: BUG:kernel_reboot-without-warning_in_boot_stage kernel test robot
2020-05-17 3:47 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-05-18 10:11 ` Marco Elver
2020-05-18 12:44 ` Marco Elver
2020-05-18 14:34 ` Marco Elver
2020-05-18 17:49 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-05-18 18:05 ` Marco Elver [this message]
2020-05-19 10:16 ` Marco Elver
2020-05-19 13:40 ` Marco Elver
2020-05-19 18:32 ` Marco Elver
2020-05-20 16:32 ` Nick Desaulniers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200518180513.GA114619@google.com \
--to=elver@google.com \
--cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
--cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rong.a.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox