RE: [PATCH 31/33] sctp: add sctp_sock_set_nodelay

David Laight
2020-05-21T09:06:31Z

From: Christoph Hellwig
> Sent: 21 May 2020 09:35
> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 08:39:13PM -0300, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> > On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 04:23:55PM -0700, David Miller wrote:
> > > From: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@gmail.com>
> > > Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 20:10:01 -0300
> > >
> > > > The duplication with sctp_setsockopt_nodelay() is quite silly/bad.
> > > > Also, why have the 'true' hardcoded? It's what dlm uses, yes, but the
> > > > API could be a bit more complete than that.
> > >
> > > The APIs are being designed based upon what in-tree users actually
> > > make use of. We can expand things later if necessary.
> >
> > Sometimes expanding things later can be though, thus why the worry.
> > But ok, I get it. Thanks.
> >
> > The comment still applies, though. (re the duplication)
>
> Where do you see duplication?

The whole thing just doesn't scale.

As soon as you get to the slightly more complex requests
like SCTP_INITMSG (which should probably be called to
set the required number of data streams) you've either
got replicated code or nested wrappers.

David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)