Re: [PATCH 3/4] remoteproc: add support for a new 64-bit trace version

Bjorn Andersson
2020-05-22T17:33:52Z

On Fri 22 May 09:54 PDT 2020, Suman Anna wrote:

> On 5/21/20 2:42 PM, Suman Anna wrote:
> > Hi Bjorn,
> >
> > On 5/21/20 1:04 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > > On Wed 25 Mar 13:47 PDT 2020, Suman Anna wrote:
[..]
> > > > diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
[..]
> > > > +struct fw_rsc_trace2 {
> > >
> > > Sounds more like fw_rsc_trace64 to me - in particular since the version
> > > of trace2 is 1...
> >
> > Yeah, will rename this.
> >
> > >
> > > > +    u32 padding;
> > > > +    u64 da;
> > > > +    u32 len;
> > > > +    u32 reserved;
> > >
> > > What's the purpose of this reserved field?
> >
> > Partly to make sure the entire resource is aligned on an 8-byte, and
> > partly copied over from fw_rsc_trace entry. I guess 32-bits is already
> > large enough of a size for trace entries irrespective of 32-bit or
> > 64-bit traces, so I doubt if we want to make the len field also a u64.
>
> Looking at this again, I can drop both padding and reserved fields, if I
> move the len field before da. Any preferences/comments?
>

Sounds good to me.

Thanks,
Bjorn