From: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>,
SoC Team <soc@kernel.org>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@kernel.org>,
Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/15] ARM: berlin: Drop unneeded select of HAVE_SMP
Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 18:36:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200522183657.00b33079@xhacker.debian> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK8P3a1qu-E8XKPiaBF0PqgGfBjNHbcONz-tgby3jt1X1X8Ymw@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 22 May 2020 12:34:43 +0200 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, May 22, 2020 at 12:13 PM Jisheng Zhang
> <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Arnd, Kevin, Olof,
> >
> > On Tue, 5 May 2020 17:07:13 +0200 Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Support for Marvell Berlin SoCs depends on ARCH_MULTI_V7.
> > > As the latter selects HAVE_SMP, there is no need for MACH_BERLIN_BG2 to
> > > select HAVE_SMP.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@glider.be>
> > > Cc: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com>
> > > Cc: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com>
> > > Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> >
> > The patch looks good to me. I want to know what will be the mainline
> > path of this series. SoC maintainers take it then send A PR to arm-soc?
> > Or each SoC maintainers ack it, arm-soc will take the whole series?
> > If later, then
> >
> > Acked-by: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com>
> >
> >
> > This is the first time I see a series touch different SoC platforms.
>
> I have already merged it. The normal way we do this is that platform
> maintainers can choose to merge individual patches when they
> are happy with them on the early review, or provide an Ack for
> them to get merged as a branch.
>
> I picked up v2 of the series as there seemed to be a sufficient
> number of Acks and everyone that commented had agreed
> in principle.
>
Nice. Thanks a lot
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-22 10:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-05 15:07 [PATCH v2 00/15] ARM: Drop unneeded select of multi-platform selected options Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-05-05 15:07 ` [PATCH v2 01/15] ARM: arch timer: Drop unneeded select GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-05-05 15:07 ` [PATCH v2 02/15] ARM: actions: Drop unneeded select of COMMON_CLK Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-05-05 16:04 ` Andreas Färber
2020-05-05 16:45 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-05-05 15:07 ` [PATCH v2 03/15] ARM: alpine: Drop unneeded select of HAVE_SMP Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-05-05 15:07 ` [PATCH v2 04/15] ARM: asm9260: Drop unneeded select of GENERIC_CLOCKEVENTS Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-05-05 15:07 ` [PATCH v2 05/15] ARM: aspeed: Drop unneeded select of HAVE_SMP Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-05-05 15:07 ` [PATCH v2 06/15] ARM: berlin: " Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-05-22 10:12 ` Jisheng Zhang
2020-05-22 10:34 ` Arnd Bergmann
2020-05-22 10:36 ` Jisheng Zhang [this message]
2020-05-05 15:07 ` [PATCH v2 07/15] ARM: clps711x: Drop unneeded select of multi-platform selected options Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-05-05 15:07 ` [PATCH v2 08/15] ARM: davinci: Drop unneeded select of TIMER_OF Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-05-05 15:07 ` [PATCH v2 09/15] ARM: integrator: Drop unneeded select of SPARSE_IRQ Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-05-05 15:07 ` [PATCH v2 10/15] ARM: mmp: Drop unneeded select of COMMON_CLK Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-05-05 15:07 ` [PATCH v2 11/15] ARM: mvebu: Drop unneeded select of HAVE_SMP Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-05-05 15:13 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-05-05 15:07 ` [PATCH v2 12/15] ARM: omap2plus: Drop unneeded select of MIGHT_HAVE_CACHE_L2X0 Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-05-05 18:26 ` Tony Lindgren
2020-05-07 17:49 ` Tony Lindgren
2020-05-05 15:07 ` [PATCH v2 13/15] ARM: prima2: Drop unneeded select of HAVE_SMP Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-05-05 15:07 ` [PATCH v2 14/15] ARM: realview: Drop unneeded select of multi-platform features Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-05-05 15:07 ` [PATCH v2 15/15] ARM: socfpga: Drop unneeded select of PCI_DOMAINS_GENERIC Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200522183657.00b33079@xhacker.debian \
--to=jisheng.zhang@synaptics.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=geert+renesas@glider.be \
--cc=khilman@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=sebastian.hesselbarth@gmail.com \
--cc=soc@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox