From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.7 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A78DDC433E1 for ; Sat, 23 May 2020 17:09:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8457A2053B for ; Sat, 23 May 2020 17:09:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388036AbgEWRJS (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 May 2020 13:09:18 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:52986 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2388007AbgEWRJM (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 May 2020 13:09:12 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EB4112FC; Sat, 23 May 2020 10:09:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usa.arm.com (e103737-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.197.49]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 8A4E43F305; Sat, 23 May 2020 10:09:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Sudeep Holla To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: Sudeep Holla , Arnd Bergmann , Greg Kroah-Hartman , Linus Walleij Subject: [PATCH 5/8] soc: ux500: Switch to use DEVICE_ATTR_RO() Date: Sat, 23 May 2020 18:08:56 +0100 Message-Id: <20200523170859.50003-6-sudeep.holla@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20200523170859.50003-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> References: <20200523170859.50003-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Move device attributes to DEVICE_ATTR_RO() as that would make things a lot more "obvious" what is happening over the existing __ATTR usage. Cc: Linus Walleij Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla --- drivers/soc/ux500/ux500-soc-id.c | 12 +++++------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/soc/ux500/ux500-soc-id.c b/drivers/soc/ux500/ux500-soc-id.c index d64feeb51a40..55ceb67e066b 100644 --- a/drivers/soc/ux500/ux500-soc-id.c +++ b/drivers/soc/ux500/ux500-soc-id.c @@ -146,9 +146,8 @@ static const char * __init ux500_get_revision(void) return kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s", "Unknown"); } -static ssize_t ux500_get_process(struct device *dev, - struct device_attribute *attr, - char *buf) +static ssize_t +process_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) { if (dbx500_id.process == 0x00) return sprintf(buf, "Standard\n"); @@ -156,6 +155,8 @@ static ssize_t ux500_get_process(struct device *dev, return sprintf(buf, "%02xnm\n", dbx500_id.process); } +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(process); + static const char *db8500_read_soc_id(struct device_node *backupram) { void __iomem *base; @@ -186,9 +187,6 @@ static void __init soc_info_populate(struct soc_device_attribute *soc_dev_attr, soc_dev_attr->revision = ux500_get_revision(); } -static const struct device_attribute ux500_soc_attr = - __ATTR(process, S_IRUGO, ux500_get_process, NULL); - static int __init ux500_soc_device_init(void) { struct device *parent; @@ -218,7 +216,7 @@ static int __init ux500_soc_device_init(void) } parent = soc_device_to_device(soc_dev); - device_create_file(parent, &ux500_soc_attr); + device_create_file(parent, &dev_attr_process); return 0; } -- 2.17.1