public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] locking: Introduce local_lock()
Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 09:12:14 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200525071214.GC329373@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200525070139.GB329373@gmail.com>


* Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:

> ( The other departure from spinlocks is that the 'spinlock_t' name, 
>   without underscores, while making the API names such as spin_lock() 
>   with an underscore, was a conscious didactic choice. Applying that 
>   principle to local locks gives us the spinlock_t-equivalent name of 
>   'locallock_t' - but the double 'l' reads a bit weirdly in this 
>   context. So I think using 'local_lock_t' as the data structure is 
>   probably the better approach. )

BTW., along this argument, I believe we should rename the local-lock 
header file from <linux/locallock.h> to <linux/local_lock.h>.

The reason for the <linux/spinlock.h> naming is that the main data 
structure is spinlock_t.

Having <linux/locallock.h> for 'struct local_lock' or 'local_lock_t' 
would introduce an idiosyncratic namespace quirk for no good reason.

Thanks,

	Ingo

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-25  7:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-24 21:57 [PATCH 0/7 v2] Introduce local_lock() Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-05-24 21:57 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] locking: " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-05-25  7:01   ` Ingo Molnar
2020-05-25  7:12     ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2020-05-25 11:27       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-05-25 11:26     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-05-24 21:57 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] radix-tree: Use local_lock for protection Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-05-25  6:29   ` Ingo Molnar
2020-05-25 11:11     ` Matthew Wilcox
2020-05-25 13:26       ` Ingo Molnar
2020-05-25 11:17     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-05-24 21:57 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] mm/swap: " Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-05-25  6:44   ` Ingo Molnar
2020-05-25 17:07     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-05-24 21:57 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] squashfs: make use of local lock in multi_cpu decompressor Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-05-24 21:57 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] connector/cn_proc: Protect send_msg() with a local lock Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-05-25  7:18   ` Ingo Molnar
2020-05-25 14:51     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-05-24 21:57 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] zram: Allocate struct zcomp_strm as per-CPU memory Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-05-25  7:24   ` Ingo Molnar
2020-05-25 16:50     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-05-24 21:57 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] zram: Use local lock to protect per-CPU data Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2020-05-25  7:26   ` Ingo Molnar
2020-05-25 16:51     ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200525071214.GC329373@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox