From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE251C433DF for ; Wed, 27 May 2020 00:36:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B32D72071A for ; Wed, 27 May 2020 00:36:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=lunn.ch header.i=@lunn.ch header.b="TUUkzmgk" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727008AbgE0AgM (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 May 2020 20:36:12 -0400 Received: from vps0.lunn.ch ([185.16.172.187]:50832 "EHLO vps0.lunn.ch" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726835AbgE0AgL (ORCPT ); Tue, 26 May 2020 20:36:11 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lunn.ch; s=20171124; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=dHwdo0GBFJtq7Bz0Rhb/SapfT7fvYk4CTg+ymutxVpQ=; b=TUUkzmgkWSxlZnA0ka88IWknt6 yYjzhKpB6bCIb4NRI3d28kgi0UnCHROMEyK26chd5Tit/Dfur09rLSd1ihLrODCWFNIhmy3fmquI5 EgSJuvH4Wp/ZP96lBhrNvm9hvZiWYB51ibMDMy3OPF6n5fWXGua4/RAiiIWD0pDnoSPo=; Received: from andrew by vps0.lunn.ch with local (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1jdk3G-003L9Y-7X; Wed, 27 May 2020 02:36:10 +0200 Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 02:36:10 +0200 From: Andrew Lunn To: Michael Walle Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "David S . Miller" , Jakub Kicinski , Vladimir Oltean , Alex Marginean , Claudiu Manoil Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] net: enetc: remove bootloader dependency Message-ID: <20200527003610.GD782807@lunn.ch> References: <20200526225050.5997-1-michael@walle.cc> <8b6054895d6d843a22cf046966645f5b@walle.cc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8b6054895d6d843a22cf046966645f5b@walle.cc> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 12:52:18AM +0200, Michael Walle wrote: > > These patches were picked from the following series: > > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/1567779344-30965-1-git-send-email-claudiu.manoil@nxp.com/ > > They have never been resent. I've picked them up, addressed Andrews > > comments, fixed some more bugs and asked Claudiu if I can keep their SOB > > tags; he agreed. I've tested this on our board which happens to have a > > bootloader which doesn't do the enetc setup in all cases. > > If my SOB is wrong in the patches, please let me know. Hi Michael Everybody in the path of the patch needs to add their SOB. So this is correct. Andrew