From: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
To: Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf ordered_events: Optimise event object reuse
Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 12:25:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200527102533.GG350217@krava> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200526135928.946-1-matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 02:59:28PM +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
SNIP
> +
> +/*
> + * Allocate a new event object from the free event cache.
> + *
> + * Find the first address range in the cache and carve out enough bytes
> + * for an ordered_event objects. The object with the lowest address is
> + * always returned so that subsequent allocations benefit from
> + * contiguous memory accesses (spatial locality).
> + */
> +static struct ordered_event *free_event_get_tree(struct ordered_events *oe)
> +{
> + struct interval_tree_node *it;
> + struct ordered_event *new;
> + size_t bytes = sizeof(*new);
> +
> + it = interval_tree_iter_first(&oe->cache.rb, 0, ULONG_MAX);
> + if (!it)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + /* Has the cache memory been exhausted? */
> + assert(cache_region_size(it) >= bytes);
> +
> + new = (void *)it->start;
> +
> + if (cache_region_size(it) == bytes) {
> + interval_tree_remove(it, &oe->cache.rb);
> + free(it);
> + }
> +
> + it->start += bytes;
this does not look right.. should this go to else path in above condition?
jirka
> + return new;
> +}
> +
SNIP
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-27 10:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-26 13:59 [PATCH v2] perf ordered_events: Optimise event object reuse Matt Fleming
2020-05-26 15:52 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-05-27 10:25 ` Jiri Olsa [this message]
2020-05-28 6:59 ` Matt Fleming
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200527102533.GG350217@krava \
--to=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox