From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: "Zhang, Qiang" <Qiang.Zhang@windriver.com>
Cc: Markus Elfring <markus.elfring@web.de>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org"
<kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 回复: [PATCH v5] workqueue: Remove unnecessary kfree() call in rcu_free_wq()
Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 12:57:03 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200528095703.GH30374@kadam> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DM6PR11MB3257D6E7E93A518392502809FF8E0@DM6PR11MB3257.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Guys, the patch is wrong. The kfree is harmless when this is called
from destroy_workqueue() and required when it's called from
pwq_unbound_release_workfn(). Lai Jiangshan already explained this
already. Why are we still discussing this?
regards,
dan carpenter
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-28 9:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-27 7:57 [PATCH v5] workqueue: Remove unnecessary kfree() call in rcu_free_wq() qiang.zhang
2020-05-27 8:20 ` Markus Elfring
[not found] ` <DM6PR11MB32573F3884A864ECD586235EFF8E0@DM6PR11MB3257.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
2020-05-28 1:44 ` 回复: " Zhang, Qiang
2020-05-28 9:57 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2020-05-28 10:38 ` Tejun Heo
2020-05-28 11:00 ` [v5] " Markus Elfring
2020-05-28 14:40 ` Markus Elfring
2020-05-28 12:08 ` 回复: [PATCH v5] " Lai Jiangshan
2020-05-28 12:25 ` Dan Carpenter
2020-05-28 13:27 ` Lai Jiangshan
2020-05-28 14:03 ` Tejun Heo
2020-05-28 14:45 ` [v5] " Markus Elfring
2020-05-28 14:06 ` 回复: [PATCH v5] " Dan Carpenter
2020-05-28 15:25 ` [v5] " Markus Elfring
2020-05-28 15:02 ` Markus Elfring
2020-05-28 15:02 ` Markus Elfring
2020-05-27 13:52 ` [PATCH v5] " Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200528095703.GH30374@kadam \
--to=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=Qiang.Zhang@windriver.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markus.elfring@web.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox