From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Enderborg, Peter" <Peter.Enderborg@sony.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] debugfs: Add mount restriction option
Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 14:23:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200528122335.GA3258226@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1611bed3-8c55-3ba0-af59-c75ad8eeedcc@sony.com>
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 12:04:32PM +0000, Enderborg, Peter wrote:
> On 5/28/20 11:27 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 08:39:02AM +0000, Enderborg, Peter wrote:
> >> On 5/28/20 10:27 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> >>> On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 10:00:31AM +0200, Peter Enderborg wrote:
> >>>> Since debugfs include sensitive information it need to be treated
> >>>> carefully. But it also has many very useful debug functions for userspace.
> >>>> With this option we can have same configuration for system with
> >>>> need of debugfs and a way to turn it off. It is needed new
> >>>> kernel command line parameter to be activated.
> >>> By "configuration" do you mean "kernel configuration"? What is wrong
> >>> with relying on the build option like we do today?
> >>>
> >>> You might want to reword all of this to make more sense about the
> >>> "problem" you are trying to solve here, as I don't really understand it,
> >>> sorry.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Peter Enderborg <peter.enderborg@sony.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> fs/debugfs/inode.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
> >>>> lib/Kconfig.debug | 10 ++++++++++
> >>>> 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>> No documentation update? That's not good :(
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> diff --git a/fs/debugfs/inode.c b/fs/debugfs/inode.c
> >>>> index b7f2e971ecbc..bde37dab77e0 100644
> >>>> --- a/fs/debugfs/inode.c
> >>>> +++ b/fs/debugfs/inode.c
> >>>> @@ -786,10 +786,25 @@ bool debugfs_initialized(void)
> >>>> }
> >>>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(debugfs_initialized);
> >>>>
> >>>> +static int allow_debugfs;
> >>>> +
> >>>> +static int __init debugfs_kernel(char *str)
> >>>> +{
> >>>> + if (str && !strcmp(str, "true"))
> >>>> + allow_debugfs = true;
> >>>> +
> >>>> + return 0;
> >>>> +
> >>>> +}
> >>>> +early_param("debugfs", debugfs_kernel);
> >>>> +
> >>>> static int __init debugfs_init(void)
> >>>> {
> >>>> int retval;
> >>>> -
> >>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS_MOUNT_RESTRICTED
> >>>> + if (!allow_debugfs)
> >>>> + return -EPERM;
> >>>> +#endif
> >>> But you are not restricting the ability to mount it here, you are
> >>> removing the ability for it to even start up at all. What does this
> >>> break for code that thinks the filesystem is registered (i.e. the call
> >>> to simple_pin_fs() in start_creating() in fs/debugfs/inode.c?
> >>>
> >> If it does, the lines below is also cause the same problem.
> > In a working system, errors in the lines below will never happen :)
>
> I think it is not unreasonable to expect that debug functionality are robust enough to handle
> system where not everything is working smoothly.
I do not disagree, but have you tested this to ensure that your kernel
still works when you disable debugfs in this manner?
If so, great! Just trying to point out a potential problem...
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-28 12:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-28 8:00 [PATCH] debugfs: Add mount restriction option Peter Enderborg
2020-05-28 8:27 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-05-28 8:39 ` Enderborg, Peter
2020-05-28 9:27 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2020-05-28 12:04 ` Enderborg, Peter
2020-05-28 12:23 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2020-05-28 12:41 ` Enderborg, Peter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200528122335.GA3258226@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=Peter.Enderborg@sony.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox