From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com>
Cc: Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Tycho Andersen <tycho@tycho.ws>,
Matt Denton <mpdenton@google.com>,
Sargun Dhillon <sargun@sargun.me>,
Chris Palmer <palmer@google.com>,
Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>,
Robert Sesek <rsesek@google.com>,
Jeffrey Vander Stoep <jeffv@google.com>,
Linux Containers <containers@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] seccomp: notify user trap about unused filter
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 00:56:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202005290055.D6E777A@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200529075137.gkwclirogbe3ae2a@wittgenstein>
On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 09:51:37AM +0200, Christian Brauner wrote:
> Aside from this being not an issue now, can we please not dump seccomp
> filter contents in proc. That sounds terrible and what's the rationale,
> libseccomp already let's you dump filter contents while loading and you
> could ptrace it. But maybe I'm missing a giant need for this...
The use-case comes from Android wanting to audit seccomp filters at
runtime. I think this is stalled until there is a good answer to "what
are you going to audit for, and how, given raw BPF?"
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-29 7:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-28 15:14 [PATCH v2 1/2] seccomp: notify user trap about unused filter Christian Brauner
2020-05-28 15:14 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] tests: test seccomp filter notifications Christian Brauner
2020-05-29 5:41 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-29 8:00 ` Christian Brauner
2020-05-28 23:11 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] seccomp: notify user trap about unused filter Kees Cook
2020-05-28 23:32 ` Jann Horn
2020-05-29 5:36 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-29 7:51 ` Christian Brauner
2020-05-29 7:56 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2020-05-29 8:00 ` Christian Brauner
2020-05-29 8:50 ` Christian Brauner
2020-05-29 7:47 ` Christian Brauner
2020-05-29 8:02 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-29 7:56 ` Christian Brauner
2020-05-29 8:06 ` Kees Cook
2020-05-29 8:37 ` Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202005290055.D6E777A@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=christian.brauner@ubuntu.com \
--cc=containers@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cyphar@cyphar.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jeffv@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mpdenton@google.com \
--cc=palmer@google.com \
--cc=rsesek@google.com \
--cc=sargun@sargun.me \
--cc=tycho@tycho.ws \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox