From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 283CAC433E0 for ; Fri, 29 May 2020 09:48:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 018F02074B for ; Fri, 29 May 2020 09:48:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="Q22bFrgT" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726727AbgE2JsG (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 May 2020 05:48:06 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53256 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725306AbgE2JsE (ORCPT ); Fri, 29 May 2020 05:48:04 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de (mail.skyhub.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:190:11c2::b:1457]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF636C03E969; Fri, 29 May 2020 02:48:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zn.tnic (p200300ec2f0f5e0080f2cd34aea9096d.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f0f:5e00:80f2:cd34:aea9:96d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 3DC1F1EC02AC; Fri, 29 May 2020 11:48:03 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1590745683; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=XpGYVaIrvzVcoTinGLvL4KJrmoZUDhZeRnH1Glh7gfI=; b=Q22bFrgTvPzsvmYlkM9MfpjuezT3RfqCEAzdC22rWXLoicrbxr4aI34ozU80pQWb+GH87D lDxKi/AeUmCxuTUOfCMZXvdh0v9JLtsEc3/7dkqSml0y++gtwB0BlYwbsJzp3OobirE/rM 9N9V3xWeqTUs1DYzS/3lijqdsfTe7bo= Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 11:47:58 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Markus Elfring Cc: linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, Doug Thompson , Greg Kroah-Hartman , James Morse , Kangjie Lu , Mauro Carvalho Chehab , Qiushi Wu , Robert Richter , Tony Luck Subject: Re: [PATCH] edac: Fix reference count leak in edac_device_register_sysfs_main_kobj() Message-ID: <20200529094758.GD9011@zn.tnic> References: <28ebc99f-c0dd-00b2-7a53-9edf0df36c9c@web.de> <20200529093644.GC9011@zn.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 11:40:47AM +0200, Markus Elfring wrote: > Have we got different programming expectations also around the application > of the Linux coding style? We have me stopping you from giving new submitters wrong review and bad advice. Please refrain from "reviewing" EDAC patches! -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette