public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ashok.raj@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] ACPI/PCI: Ignore _OSC negotiation result if pcie_ports_native is set.
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 18:12:54 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200529231254.GA480133@bjorn-Precision-5520> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <969d4f083f445532bd1cdd98e3ce110574a461b0.1590534843.git.sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>

On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 04:18:27PM -0700, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
> 
> pcie_ports_native is set only if user requests native handling
> of PCIe capabilities via pcie_port_setup command line option.
> User input takes precedence over _OSC based control negotiation
> result. So consider the _OSC negotiated result only if
> pcie_ports_native is unset.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/pci_root.c | 26 ++++++++++++++------------
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> index 9e235c1a75ff..e0039ad3480a 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/pci_root.c
> @@ -914,18 +914,20 @@ struct pci_bus *acpi_pci_root_create(struct acpi_pci_root *root,
>  		goto out_release_info;
>  
>  	host_bridge = to_pci_host_bridge(bus->bridge);
> -	if (!(root->osc_control_set & OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL))
> -		host_bridge->native_pcie_hotplug = 0;
> -	if (!(root->osc_control_set & OSC_PCI_SHPC_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL))
> -		host_bridge->native_shpc_hotplug = 0;
> -	if (!(root->osc_control_set & OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_AER_CONTROL))
> -		host_bridge->native_aer = 0;
> -	if (!(root->osc_control_set & OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_PME_CONTROL))
> -		host_bridge->native_pme = 0;
> -	if (!(root->osc_control_set & OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_LTR_CONTROL))
> -		host_bridge->native_ltr = 0;
> -	if (!(root->osc_control_set & OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_DPC_CONTROL))
> -		host_bridge->native_dpc = 0;
> +	if (!pcie_ports_native) {
> +		if (!(root->osc_control_set & OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL))
> +			host_bridge->native_pcie_hotplug = 0;
> +		if (!(root->osc_control_set & OSC_PCI_SHPC_NATIVE_HP_CONTROL))
> +			host_bridge->native_shpc_hotplug = 0;
> +		if (!(root->osc_control_set & OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_AER_CONTROL))
> +			host_bridge->native_aer = 0;
> +		if (!(root->osc_control_set & OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_PME_CONTROL))
> +			host_bridge->native_pme = 0;
> +		if (!(root->osc_control_set & OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_LTR_CONTROL))
> +			host_bridge->native_ltr = 0;
> +		if (!(root->osc_control_set & OSC_PCI_EXPRESS_DPC_CONTROL))
> +			host_bridge->native_dpc = 0;
> +	}

I like this, but what I had in mind was to *remove* the tests of
pcie_ports_native elsewhere at the same time.

For example, 

  @@ -255,7 +255,7 @@ static bool pme_is_native(struct pcie_device *dev)
	  const struct pci_host_bridge *host;

	  host = pci_find_host_bridge(dev->port->bus);
  -       return pcie_ports_native || host->native_pme;
  +       return host->native_pme;
   }

and

  @@ -221,7 +221,7 @@ int pcie_aer_is_native(struct pci_dev *dev)
	  if (!dev->aer_cap)
		  return 0;

  -       return pcie_ports_native || host->native_aer;
  +       return host->native_aer;
   }

So I deferred these two _OSC-related things for now.  We can work on
this more in the next cycle.

>  	/*
>  	 * Evaluate the "PCI Boot Configuration" _DSM Function.  If it
> -- 
> 2.17.1
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2020-05-29 23:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-26 23:18 [PATCH v4 0/5] Remove AER HEST table parser sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2020-05-26 23:18 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] PCI/AER: Remove redundant pci_is_pcie() checks sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2020-05-26 23:18 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] PCI/AER: Remove redundant dev->aer_cap checks sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2020-05-26 23:18 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] ACPI/PCI: Ignore _OSC negotiation result if pcie_ports_native is set sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2020-05-29 23:12   ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
2020-05-26 23:18 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] ACPI/PCI: Ignore _OSC DPC negotiation result if pcie_ports_dpc_native " sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2020-05-26 23:18 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] PCI/AER: Replace pcie_aer_get_firmware_first() with pcie_aer_is_native() sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy
2020-05-29 23:09 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] Remove AER HEST table parser Bjorn Helgaas
2020-05-29 23:15   ` Kuppuswamy, Sathyanarayanan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200529231254.GA480133@bjorn-Precision-5520 \
    --to=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox