linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@collabora.com>
To: Bean Huo <huobean@gmail.com>
Cc: miquel.raynal@bootlin.com, vigneshr@ti.com,
	s.hauer@pengutronix.de, derosier@gmail.com,
	Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at>,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/5] Micron SLC NAND filling block
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2020 09:48:25 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200602094825.26396b06@collabora.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0a4fc94213ca5c2040796a66942f626587483721.camel@gmail.com>

Hi Bean,

On Mon, 01 Jun 2020 23:10:43 +0200
Bean Huo <huobean@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Richard 
> would you please help us confirm below question??

Miquel suggested an approach that would allow us to deal with both JFFS2
and UBI/UBIFS without having any FS/wear-leveling specific code at the
NAND level, but you decided to ignore his comments. Sorry but there's
nothing we can do to help you if you don't listen to our
recommendations.

I've been quite disappointed by your behavior in the past, and it
continues. Recently you've taken Miquel's patches and claimed ownership
on them (probably not intentionally, but still) while you were clearly
unable to rework your original series the way I suggested (which Miquel
did after seeing you would never send new versions). And when Miquel
suggested a change to the implementation he had done based on the
discussion we had with Richard, you decided to ignore it and pursue in
the original direction. So, quite frankly, I'm really not convinced you
can conduct such a change.

Regards,

Boris

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-06-02  7:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-25 12:18 [PATCH v6 0/5] Micron SLC NAND filling block Bean Huo
2020-05-25 12:18 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] mtd: rawnand: group all NAND specific ops into new nand_chip_ops Bean Huo
2020-05-25 12:18 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] mtd: rawnand: Add {pre, post}_erase hooks in nand_chip_ops Bean Huo
2020-05-25 12:18 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] mtd: rawnand: Add write_oob hook " Bean Huo
2020-05-25 12:18 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] mtd: rawnand: Introduce a new function nand_check_is_erased_page() Bean Huo
2020-05-25 12:18 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] mtd: rawnand: micron: Micron SLC NAND filling block Bean Huo
2020-05-28 14:14 ` [PATCH v6 0/5] " Bean Huo
2020-06-01 21:10   ` Bean Huo
2020-06-02  7:05     ` Miquel Raynal
2020-06-02  7:48     ` Boris Brezillon [this message]
2020-06-02  8:59       ` Bean Huo
2020-06-02 11:53         ` Boris Brezillon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200602094825.26396b06@collabora.com \
    --to=boris.brezillon@collabora.com \
    --cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
    --cc=derosier@gmail.com \
    --cc=huobean@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=miquel.raynal@bootlin.com \
    --cc=richard@nod.at \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).