public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@linaro.org>
Cc: daniel.thompson@linaro.org, kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net,
	jason.wessel@windriver.com, dianders@chromium.org,
	sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	jslaby@suse.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] kdb: Switch to use safer dbg_io_ops over console APIs
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2020 10:25:04 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200603082503.GD14855@linux-b0ei> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1591168935-6382-5-git-send-email-sumit.garg@linaro.org>

On Wed 2020-06-03 12:52:15, Sumit Garg wrote:
> In kgdb context, calling console handlers aren't safe due to locks used
> in those handlers which could in turn lead to a deadlock. Although, using
> oops_in_progress increases the chance to bypass locks in most console
> handlers but it might not be sufficient enough in case a console uses
> more locks (VT/TTY is good example).
> 
> Currently when a driver provides both polling I/O and a console then kdb
> will output using the console. We can increase robustness by using the
> currently active polling I/O driver (which should be lockless) instead
> of the corresponding console. For several common cases (e.g. an
> embedded system with a single serial port that is used both for console
> output and debugger I/O) this will result in no console handler being
> used.
> 
> In order to achieve this we need to reverse the order of preference to
> use dbg_io_ops (uses polling I/O mode) over console APIs. So we just
> store "struct console" that represents debugger I/O in dbg_io_ops and
> while emitting kdb messages, skip console that matches dbg_io_ops
> console in order to avoid duplicate messages. After this change,
> "is_console" param becomes redundant and hence removed.
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/kgdboc.c b/drivers/tty/serial/kgdboc.c
> index 4139698..6e182aa 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/kgdboc.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/kgdboc.c
> @@ -558,6 +557,7 @@ static int __init kgdboc_earlycon_init(char *opt)
>  	}
>  
>  	earlycon = con;
> +	kgdboc_earlycon_io_ops.cons = con;
>  	pr_info("Going to register kgdb with earlycon '%s'\n", con->name);
>  	if (kgdb_register_io_module(&kgdboc_earlycon_io_ops) != 0) {
>  		earlycon = NULL;

Should we clear kgdboc_earlycon_io_ops.cons here when
kgdb_register_io_module() failed?

> diff --git a/include/linux/kgdb.h b/include/linux/kgdb.h
> index c62d764..529116b 100644
> --- a/include/linux/kgdb.h
> +++ b/include/linux/kgdb.h
> @@ -276,8 +276,7 @@ struct kgdb_arch {
>   * the I/O driver.
>   * @post_exception: Pointer to a function that will do any cleanup work
>   * for the I/O driver.
> - * @is_console: 1 if the end device is a console 0 if the I/O device is
> - * not a console
> + * @cons: valid if the I/O device is a console; else NULL.
>   */
>  struct kgdb_io {
>  	const char		*name;
> @@ -288,7 +287,7 @@ struct kgdb_io {
>  	void			(*deinit) (void);
>  	void			(*pre_exception) (void);
>  	void			(*post_exception) (void);
> -	int			is_console;
> +	struct console		*cons;

Nit: I would call it "con". The trailing 's' makes me feel that that the
     variable points to an array or list of consoles.

>  };
>  

Otherwise, it looks pretty straightforward.

Best Regards,
Petr

  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-03  8:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-03  7:22 [PATCH v5 0/4] kdb: Improve console handling Sumit Garg
2020-06-03  7:22 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] kdb: Re-factor kdb_printf() message write code Sumit Garg
2020-06-03  8:07   ` Petr Mladek
2020-06-03  7:22 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] kdb: Check status of console prior to invoking handlers Sumit Garg
2020-06-03  8:08   ` Petr Mladek
2020-06-03  7:22 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] kdb: Make kdb_printf() console handling more robust Sumit Garg
2020-06-03  8:10   ` Petr Mladek
2020-06-03  7:22 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] kdb: Switch to use safer dbg_io_ops over console APIs Sumit Garg
2020-06-03  8:25   ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2020-06-03  9:18     ` Daniel Thompson
2020-06-03 11:59       ` Petr Mladek
2020-06-03  9:32     ` Sumit Garg
2020-06-03 11:42       ` Daniel Thompson
2020-06-03 13:05         ` Sumit Garg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200603082503.GD14855@linux-b0ei \
    --to=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
    --cc=dianders@chromium.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jason.wessel@windriver.com \
    --cc=jslaby@suse.com \
    --cc=kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
    --cc=sumit.garg@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox