From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: bp@alien8.de, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@kernel.org,
clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com, paulmck@kernel.org,
dvyukov@google.com, glider@google.com, andreyknvl@google.com,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] kcov, objtool: Make runtime functions noinstr-compatible
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2020 17:25:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200604152537.GD3976@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200604145635.21565-1-elver@google.com>
On Thu, Jun 04, 2020 at 04:56:34PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote:
> While we lack a compiler attribute to add to noinstr that would disable
> KCOV, make the KCOV runtime functions return if the caller is in a
> noinstr section. We then whitelist __sanitizer_cov_*() functions in
> objtool.
> __sanitizer_cov_*() cannot safely become safe noinstr functions
> as-is, as they may fault due to accesses to vmalloc's memory.
I would feel very much better with those actually in noinstr, because
without it, there is nothing stopping us from adding a kprobe/hw-
breakpoint or other funny to the function.
Even if they almost instra-return, having a kprobe on the function entry
or condition check is enough to utterly wreck things.
So something like:
void noinstr __sanitizer_cov_trace_*(...)
{
if (within_noinstr_section(ip))
return;
instrumentation_begin();
write_comp_data(...);
instrumentation_end();
}
Would make me feel a whole lot better.
> +static __always_inline bool in_noinstr_section(unsigned long ip)
> +{
> + return (unsigned long)__noinstr_text_start <= ip &&
> + ip < (unsigned long)__noinstr_text_end;
> +}
.entry.text is also considered noinstr, although I suppose that all
being in .S files avoids it having annotations inserted, but perhaps a
comment?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-04 15:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-04 14:56 [PATCH v2 1/2] kcov, objtool: Make runtime functions noinstr-compatible Marco Elver
2020-06-04 14:56 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] kcov: Pass -fno-stack-protector with Clang Marco Elver
2020-06-04 17:05 ` Nick Desaulniers
2020-06-04 15:25 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2021-08-12 14:04 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] kcov, objtool: Make runtime functions noinstr-compatible Marco Elver
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200604152537.GD3976@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox