From: Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>
To: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
kenneth-lee-2012@foxmail.com, Wangzhou <wangzhou1@hisilicon.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] PCI: Remove End-End TLP as PASID dependency
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2020 09:46:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200610074633.GA6844@myrica> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1591762694-9131-1-git-send-email-zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>
On Wed, Jun 10, 2020 at 12:18:14PM +0800, Zhangfei Gao wrote:
> Some platform devices appear as PCI and have PCI cfg space,
> but are actually on the AMBA bus.
> They can support PASID via smmu stall feature, but does not
> support tlp since they are not real pci devices.
> So remove tlp as a PASID dependency.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/pci/ats.c | 3 ---
> 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/ats.c b/drivers/pci/ats.c
> index 390e92f..8e31278 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/ats.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/ats.c
> @@ -344,9 +344,6 @@ int pci_enable_pasid(struct pci_dev *pdev, int features)
> if (WARN_ON(pdev->pasid_enabled))
> return -EBUSY;
>
> - if (!pdev->eetlp_prefix_path)
> - return -EINVAL;
> -
This check is useful, and follows the PCI specification (4.0r1.0
2.2.10.2 End-End TLP Prefix Processing: "Software should ensure that TLPs
containing End-End TLP Prefixes are not sent to components that do not
support them.")
Why not set the eetlp_prefix_path bit from a PCI quirk? Unlike the stall
problem from the other thread, this one looks like a simple design mistake
that can be fixed easily in future iterations of the platform: just set
the "End-End TLP Prefix Supported" bit in the Device Capability 2 Register
of all bridges.
Thanks,
Jean
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-10 7:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-10 4:18 [RFC PATCH] PCI: Remove End-End TLP as PASID dependency Zhangfei Gao
2020-06-10 7:46 ` Jean-Philippe Brucker [this message]
2020-06-10 8:00 ` Zhangfei Gao
2020-06-11 14:11 ` Sinan Kaya
2020-06-11 17:41 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2020-06-13 13:49 ` Zhangfei Gao
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200610074633.GA6844@myrica \
--to=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=kenneth-lee-2012@foxmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wangzhou1@hisilicon.com \
--cc=zhangfei.gao@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox